摘要
目的研究分析丙泊酚与咪达唑仑在急性脑出血手术中的麻醉效果。方法选取我院收治的96例急性脑出血患者作为临床研究对象,应用电脑随机号的方式将96例患者分为试验组和对照组,每组均48例患者。试验组患者施行丙泊酚药物麻醉。对照组患者施行咪达唑仑药物麻醉。记录试验组和对照组患者在围术期的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、血红蛋白值(Hb)、动脉和颈静脉的血氧饱和度和血氧分压,和对手术前后临床神经功能缺损程度平定,并进行比较分析。结果使用丙泊酚的试验组患者,其平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、血红蛋白值(Hb)、血氧饱和度和血氧分压状况较术前有了较大改善,明显优于采用咪达唑仑的对照组,具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。对照组的神经损伤情况明显优于对照组,具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论丙泊酚较咪达唑仑在急性出血手术中具有更好的麻醉效果,能有效地改善保护脑组织。
Objective To study analysis of propofol and midazolam in the acute cerebral hemorrhage surgery anesthetic effect. Methods 96 patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage patients select our hospital as a clinical study, the application of computer - generated random number of 96 patients were divided into experimental and control groups, each group of 48 patients. The experi- mental group underwent propofol drug anesthesia. The control group underwent midazolam drug anesthesia. Record of the test group and a control group of patients in the perioperative mean arterial pressure ( MAP), heart rate ( HR), hemoglobin value ( Hb), ar- terial and jugular venous oxygen saturation and blood oxygen pressure, and after surgery with pacification of the degree of neurologi- cal deficit and comparative analysis. Results Propofol subgroup, the mean arterial pressure ( MAP), heart rate ( HR), hemoglo- bin value (Hb) , oxygen saturation and blood oxygen conditions have been greatly improved compared with the preoperative obvious superior to midazolam control group, P 〈 0.05, statistically significant. The nerve injury situation of the control group was signifi- cantly better than the control group, P 〈 0.05 considered statistically significant. Conclusion Propofol compared with midazolam in the acute hemorrhage surgery has better anesthetic effect, which can effectively improve the protection of brain tissue.
出处
《临床军医杂志》
CAS
2013年第5期521-522,524,共3页
Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
基金
国家自然科学基金(81000473)
关键词
丙泊酚
咪达唑仑
急性脑出血
临床效果
propofol
midazolam
acute cerebral hemorrhage
clinical effect