台湾当代儒学的诠释学考察

RESEARCH ON HERMENEUTICS OF TAIWAN CONTEMPORARY CONFUCIANISM

检视台湾当代儒学诠释学的正当性与方法论,以回答它是否导致了当代新儒家过度诠释经典这一问题。林安梧否认熊十力有"六经注我"嫌疑,诠释是"存有三态论"哲学之要求。刘述先则提出"理一分殊"论。黄俊杰强调诠释与经典之间有两种张力,而孟子脉络解经法、"以意逆志"解经法是对此张力的缓解。李瑞全在儒学教学中实践体悟诠释方法。何信全则主张以西方形式逻辑来诠释儒学经典。

View the debate on the legitimacy and methodology of the Taiwan of Contemporary Confucianism Hermeneutics,in order to answered whether it led to the New Contemporary Confucianism excessive this problem of the interpretation of the classic.Lin Anwu denied that Xiong Shili had ＂the Six Classics Note me＂ suspects,and interpretations is of ＂being of tri-state theory＂ request.Liu Shuxian said there were the Analects of ＂Li Yi Fen Shu ＂.Huang Junjie stressed there were two types of tension between interpretation and classic,and the Mencius context exegesis／ ＂intention＂ exegesis could relief this tension.Li Ruiquan in the Confucianism teaching practiced the sort of understanding method of realizing.Then He Xinquan advocated that we could apply the Western form of logic to explain the Confucian classics.