期刊文献+

两种方案治疗妊娠合并细菌性阴道病及对不良妊娠结局的影响 被引量:33

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较妊娠合并细菌性阴道病(bacterial vaginosis,BV)两种治疗方法的疗效及对早产、胎膜早破、产褥感染及新生儿感染等不良妊娠结局的影响。方法对本院产前检查的965例孕妇做BV筛查,感染BV的146例孕妇随机分为两组:甲组(74例)给予硝呋太尔制霉素阴道软胶囊外用;乙组(72例)给予甲硝唑栓外用,观察两组治疗效果;另有不接受治疗者47例及正常妊娠者60例作为对照组,随访并记录4组早产、胎膜早破、产褥感染及新生儿感染率。结果 BV在妊娠期的检出率为20%;两治疗组之间治愈率及总有效率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但两组复发率差异显著(P<0.01);BV孕妇未治疗组的早产、胎膜早破、产褥感染及新生儿感染率明显高于治疗组和正常对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05和P<0.01);治疗组甲及治疗组乙之间不良妊娠结局发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论硝呋太尔制霉素阴道软胶囊治疗妊娠期细菌性阴道病在疗效上等同于甲硝唑栓,但其复发率低,可显著改善妊娠合并BV患者的不良妊娠结局,可作为治疗妊娠期BV的首选药物。
作者 苑媛 刘家丰
出处 《哈尔滨医科大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2013年第2期191-193,共3页 Journal of Harbin Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Ferris MJ, Masztal A, Aldridge KE, et al. Association of atopobi-um va-ginae,a recently described metronidazolere sistantanaerobe-with bacterial vaginosis[ J]. BMC InfectDis, 2004,2( 13 ) :5.
  • 2Menard JP. Antibacterial treatment of bacterial vaginosis: currentand emerging therapies [ J]. Int J Womens Health, 2011,3(8):295-305.
  • 3Ferris MJ, Norori J, Zozaya-Hinchliffe M, et al. Cultivation-inde-pendent analysis of changes in bacterial vaginosis flora followingmetronidazole treatment[ J]. J Clin Microbio, 2007,45(3) :1016-1018.
  • 4Yen S,Shafer MA, Mobcada J, et al. Bacterial Vaginosis in sexu-ally experienced and non-sexually experienced young women enter-ing the military [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2003 ,102(5) : 927-933.
  • 5郑伟,杨小福,叶晓静,姚琦玮.胎膜早破患者细菌性阴道病阴道唾液酸酶活性的检测[J].中华围产医学杂志,2002,5(2):83-85. 被引量:50
  • 6Leitich H, Bodner-Adler B,Brunbauer M, et al. Bacterial Vagi-nosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery : a meta-analysis [ J].AmJ Obstet Gynecol, 2003 ,189( 1) : 139-147.
  • 7魏玉梅,杨慧霞.细菌性阴道病与早产的关系[J].中国医刊,2006,41(9):8-10. 被引量:7
  • 8Chawanpaiboon S,Pimol K. Bacterial vaginosis in threatened pre-term, preterm and term labour[ J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2010,93(12):1351-1355.

二级参考文献15

  • 1李莪,翁梨驹.细菌性阴道病[J].中华妇产科杂志,1995,30(1):59-61. 被引量:152
  • 2樊尚荣,刘朝晖,陈春玲,高雪莲.妊娠合并细菌性阴道病的研究[J].中华妇产科杂志,1997,32(2):84-86. 被引量:82
  • 3Riggs MA, Klebanoff MA. Treatment of Vaginal Infections to Prevent Preterm Birth : A Meta-Analysis [ J ]. Clin. Obstet Gyneco,2004,47 :796 - 807.
  • 4童悦,魏丽惠.妇产科学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.116—119.
  • 5Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al. Williams Obstetrics [M]. New York:Mc Graw Hi11,2001.699-700.
  • 6Kebanoff MA, Hillier SL, Nugent RP, et al. Is bacterial vaginosis a stronger risk factor for preterm birth when it is diagnosis earlier in gestation[ J] .? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005, 192:470-477.
  • 7Guise J, Mahon SM,Aickin M, et al. Screening for Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnancy[J]. Am J Prey,2001,20: 63 -72.
  • 8Leitich H, Bodner-Adler B, Brunbaure M, et al. Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: a meta-analysis[ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,189:139 - 147.
  • 9Boskey ER, Aiherly-Trim SA, O' Campo PJ, et al. Acceptability Of A Self-Sampling Technique To Collect Vaginal Smears For Gram Stain Diagnosis Of Bacterial Vaginosis [ J ]. Women' s Health Issues, 2004, 15:14 - 18.
  • 10Jacobsson B, Pernevi P, Chidekel L et al. Bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy may predispose for preterm birth and postpartum endometritis[ J]. Acta Obstetficia et Gynecologica Scan,2002, 81 ( 11 ) : 1006.

共引文献55

同被引文献176

引证文献33

二级引证文献156

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部