摘要
目的探讨扩散加权成像(DWI)表观扩散系数(ADC)值对非透明细胞肾癌亚型的鉴别诊断价值。资料与方法经手术病理证实的48例非透明细胞肾癌患者,术前行DWI检查(b=0、800s/mm2)测定病变ADC值,比较不同亚型非透明细胞肾癌ADC值的差异。结果 48例共48个病灶,直径(3.8±2.3)cm,其中肾嫌色细胞癌(CRCC)20例,乳头状肾细胞癌(PRCC)28例(Ⅰ型18例,Ⅱ型10例)。CRCC的ADC值为(0.994±0.184)×10-3mm2/s,PRCC的ADC值为(0.860±0.114)×10-3mm2/s,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);PRCCⅠ型ADC值为(0.908±0.085)×10-3mm2/s,Ⅱ型ADC值为(0.775±0.113)×10-3mm2/s,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);CRCC和PRCCⅡ型ADC值差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),CRCC和PRCCⅠ型ADC值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论当b=800s/mm2时,ADC值可以鉴别CRCC和PRCCⅡ型,但不能鉴别PRCCⅠ型和CRCC。ADC值对鉴别非透明细胞肾癌亚型有一定帮助,但鉴别诊断效能不高。
Purpose To investigate the significance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in differential diagnosis of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Materials and Methods Forty-eight patients with pathology-proven non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma underwent preoperative diffusion weighted imaging (b=0, 800 s/mm 2 ). The ADC values in different subtypes were analyzed. Results There were 48 lesions in 48 patients with average tumor size of (3.8±2.3) cm, including 20 chromophobe cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) and 28 papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) (18 typeⅠ, 10 typeⅡ). The ADC was (0.994±0.184)×10 -3 mm 2 /s for CRCC, and (0.860±0.114)×10 -3 mm 2 /s for PRCC with statistical significance (P&lt;0.01). The ADC for type Ⅰ PRCC was (0.908±0.085)×10 -3 mm 2 /s and (0.775±0.113)×10 -3 mm 2 /s for type Ⅱ PRCC with statistical significance (P&lt;0.01). The ADC for CRCC was not significantly different from type Ⅰ PRCC (P&gt;0.05). Conclusion When b=800 s/mm 2 , ADC is useful in differentiate certain subtypes of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
出处
《中国医学影像学杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第5期377-379,共3页
Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging
关键词
癌
肾细胞
磁共振成像
扩散加权成像
表观扩散系数
诊断
鉴别
Carcinoma, renal cell
Magnetic resonance imaging
Diffusion-weighted imaging
Apparent diffusion coefficient
Diagnosis, differential