期刊文献+

我国毒驾规制的行政法反思

Reflections on the Regulation by Administrative law about Drugged Drive
下载PDF
导出
摘要 毒驾问题是继醉驾问题后又一个公共话题。未经由行政法规制而将毒驾直接入刑的做法是与现代刑法谦抑主义相悖的,而且我国毒驾规制采用的是事先性禁止驾驶的行政规制手段,这种"以权利换管理"的规制模式直接违反我国《禁毒法》相应规定,并且对毒驾问题采用行政事先审查办法予以解决,这既不符合行政许可的一般法理,也不符合实践的发展需要。因此,毒驾规制的重心应当实现从行政事先强制性禁止向事后的行政严惩转变。 Drugged drive is another popular topic after that of drunken drive. It contradicts the modesty of modem criminal law if dragged drive is put to punishment directly without the regulation by administrative law.Moreover, Chinese regulation against drugged drive is an administrative one which prohibits the drive in advance.This mode, to exchange control with right, offends the related rules of the Anti-Drug Law of China. To solve drugged drive just by administrative way of examining in advance is not in accordance with either common legal principles or practice. Therefore, the focus of regulating drugged drive should change from prohibition in advance to administrative punishment afterwards.
作者 曾文远
出处 《铁道警官高等专科学校学报》 2013年第2期49-53,共5页 Journal of Railway Ministry Zhengzhou Police College
关键词 毒驾 驾驶资格 事先禁止 事后追惩 drugged drive qualification of drive prohibit in advance punish afterward
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1于志刚.社会风险与刑法规制:“风险刑法”理论之反思[J].法商研究,2011,(4).
  • 2尹安民.力争让毒驾两三年内入刑[N].羊城晚报,2011-11 -09(6).
  • 3罗豪才,湛中乐.行政法学(第3版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012.191.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部