期刊文献+

团队共享心智模型的多层次模糊评价 被引量:3

Multi-level Fuzzy Evaluation of Team Shared Mental Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文针对团队共享心智模型的各种影响因素,运用多层次模糊评价的方法,对团队共享心智模型进行综合评价,结果表明个体因素和团队因素是影响团队共享心智模型的2个主要因素,个体因素中的团队领袖对于团队共享心智模型具有重要作用,而团队沟通和团队冲突则是在团队层面上影响团队共享心智模型的关键;对江、浙、沪等地企业的高层梯队共享心智模型的实证研究结果表明,高层梯队共享心智模型仅为一般水平,因此为了促进高层梯队共享心智模型,应充分发挥出高层梯队领袖的重要作用,培养积极向上的组织文化,营造轻松、和谐的团队氛围,鼓励各种认知冲突,抵制情感冲突,以促进高层梯队内部的团队沟通。 This paper put various influencing factors of team shared mental models into account,used multi-level fuzzy evaluation to evaluate team shared mental models comprehensively.The results showed that individual and team were two main factors which affected team shared mental models,team leader played an important role for team shared mental models among individual factors,however team communication and team conflict were the key to team shared mental models in the plane of team;the empirical research about upper echelons in the areas of Jiangsu province,Zhejiang province and Shanghai City showed that upper echelons shared mental models was only general level,in order to promote upper echelons to share mental models,it should play the important role of upper echelons' leader,cultivate positive organizational culture,create a relaxed and harmonious team atmosphere,encourage all kinds of cognitive conflicts,resist emotional conflicts,so that promoted team communication among upper echelons' members.
机构地区 上海理工大学
出处 《工业技术经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第5期10-16,共7页 Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基金 国家社科基金项目(项目编号:11BGL014) 上海市一流学科建设项目(项目编号:S1205YLXK) 上海市研究生创新基金项目(项目编号:JWCXSL1201) 上海理工大学人文社科基金项目(项目编号:11XSZ05) 上海理工大学人文社科攀登计划(项目编号:12XPA02)
关键词 团队共享心智模型 多层次模糊评价 高层梯队 team shared mental models multi-level fuzzy evaluation upper echelons
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Cannon- Bowers J A, Salas E. Shared Mental Models in Expert Team Decision Making [ C ]. In: Castellan N J Jr. (Eds). Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993:221-246.
  • 2何贵兵,杨琼.共享心理模型的测量[J].人类工效学,2006,12(4):39-41. 被引量:13
  • 3Marks M A, Zaccam S J, Mathleu J E. Performance Implications of I.eader Briefings and Team - interaction Training for Team Adaptation to Novel Environments [J]. Journal of Ap-plied Psychology, 2000, 85:971-986.
  • 4Honenbeck J R, llgen D R, Donglas J, et al. Multi - level Theory tff Team Decision Making: Decision Performance in Teams Incorporating Distributed Expertise [ J ]. Journal d Ap- plied Psychology, 1995, 80 (2): 292-316.
  • 5James L R, Demaree R G, Wolf G. Rwg: An Assess- merit of Within - group Interrater Agreement [ J ]. Journal of Ap- plied Psychology , 1993, 78:306-309.
  • 6Rentsch J R, Klimoski R J. Why do "Great Minds" "Ilfink Alike?: Antecedents of Team Member Schema Agreemenl [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2001, 22:107 - 120.
  • 7Kralger K, Wenzel L H. Conceptual Development and Empirical Evaluation d Measures of Shared Mental Models as Indi- cators of Team Effectiveness [M]. In: Brannick M T, Salas E, Prince C (Ed.). Team Performance Assessment and Measure- ment, Mahwah: Erlbaum, 1997: 63 - 84.
  • 8Cannon M D, Edmondson A C. Confronting Failure: Antecedents and Consequences of Shared Beliefs About Failure in Organizational Work Groups [ J]. Journal of Organizational Be- havior, 2001, 22:161 - 177.
  • 9Levesque L L, Wilson J M, Wholey D R. Cognitive Divergence and Shared Mental Models in Software Development Project Teams [ J ]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2001,22:135 - 144.
  • 10Stout R. J, Cannon- Bowers J A, Salas E, et al. Planning, Shared Mental Models and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link is Established [ J]. Human Factors, 1999, 41:61 - 71.

二级参考文献61

  • 1韩世莲,李旭宏,刘新旺,毛海军.多人多准则模糊层次分析法的物流中心综合评价优选模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(7):128-134. 被引量:54
  • 2张小林,王重鸣.群体绩效和团队效能研究的新进展[J].应用心理学,1997,3(2):58-64. 被引量:48
  • 3白新文,王二平.共享心智模型研究现状[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(5):791-799. 被引量:58
  • 4张晓东,胡明,张振中.船舶机电设备评估指标研究[J].船舶工程,2005,27(2):45-48. 被引量:5
  • 5Erika.H Keith.L Price.C 等.高层的团队合作[A].见Gordon Orr主编.麦肯锡高层管理论丛[C].上海:三联书店,2001.25—37.
  • 6Chang D Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1996, 95: 649-655.
  • 7Cheng C H, Yang K L, Hwang C L. Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 116(2): 423 -443.
  • 8Felix T S, Chan N, Kumar M K, et al. Global supplier selection: A fuzzy-AHP approach[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46(14): 3825-3857.
  • 9Sun Q, Chen P, Zhang D, et al. Pattern recognition for automatic machinery fault diagnosis[J]. Transactions of the ASME, J Vibr Acoust, 2004, 126(2): 307- 316.
  • 10Li X J, Bin G F, Dhillon B S. An evaluation method of mechanical equipment health state on the basis of fuzzy synthetic evaluation[J]. Fourth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2007, 3:518-522.

共引文献172

同被引文献63

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部