期刊文献+

基于跨期侵占视角的控股股东跨期减持行为 被引量:2

Controlling shareholder's intemperate reduction under intemperate expropriation
原文传递
导出
摘要 在考虑新投资机会存在的基础上,构建了跨期投资下的控股股东跨期侵占模型,并分析控股股东跨期减持行为.研究发现,理性控股股东会通过第二期的侵占行为控制最优减持比例.理论模型表明主要影响减持的因素包括控股股东初始持股比例、控股股东属性及外部法律保护力度:初始持股比例高及外部法律保护力度强的地区的上市公司的控股股东的减持水平更高,国有控股上市公司的控股股东不倾向进行减持.经验证据表明,控股股东初始持股比例和控股股东属性会产生影响,而外部法律保护力度的影响则不确定. Based on the considering of new investment opportunities, this paper sets up a controlling shareholders occupation model under the intemperate investment and analyzes the temporal reduction of controlling shareholders. It is discovered that rational shareholder will control through the second act of the optimal reduction of the proportion of occupied. Theory model shows that the main factors affected reduction include initial proportion of controlling holders, the characteristic of controlling shareholders and the external legal protection. The initial proportions of controlling shareholders and external protection efforts of investors have positive impact. Comparing to non-state holding shareholders, the state-holding shareholders don't prefer reduction. Empirical evidence shows that initial proportion of controlling holders and the characteristic of controlling shareholders have the effect. But it is uncertain that the factors of the external legal protection impact the level of controlling shareholders' reduction.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期1380-1388,共9页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-07-0905) 中央高校基本科研业务重大自主项目(CDJSK1001) 中央高校基本科研业务一般项目(CDJXS11021113)
关键词 跨期侵占 跨期减持 控股股东 intemperate expropriation intemperate reduction controlling shareholder
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献278

共引文献309

同被引文献45

  • 1肖作平.公司治理影响审计质量吗?——来自中国资本市场的经验证据[J].管理世界,2006,22(7):22-33. 被引量:118
  • 2唐跃军,李维安,谢仍明.大股东制衡机制对审计约束有效性的影响[J].会计研究,2006(7):21-29. 被引量:16
  • 3岳衡.大股东资金占用与审计师的监督[J].中国会计评论,2006,4(1):59-68. 被引量:41
  • 4Blonigen B. A., Fontagne L., Sly N. Cherries for Sale : The Incidence and Timing of Cross-border M&A [ J ]. Journal of Interna- tional Economics, 2014,94(2) :341-357.
  • 5Kansal S., Chandani A. Effective Management of Change During Merger and Acquisition[ J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014,11 (3) :208-217.
  • 6Shukla R. K. Nonlinear Preconditioning for Efficient and Accurate Interface Capturing in Simulation of Muhieomponent Compres- sible Flows[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014,276(4) :508-540.
  • 7Oh J. H., Peters L. D., Johnston W. J. Who' s Acquiring Whom? Experimental Evidence of Firm Size Effect on B2B Merg- ers and Marketing/Sales Tasks[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2014,43(6) :1035-1044.
  • 8Nojavan S., Zare K., Ashpazi M. A. A Hybrid Approach based on IGDT-MPSO Method for Optimal Bidding Strategy of Price-tak- er Generation Station in Day-ahead Electricity Market[ J ]. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2015,69 (1) :335-343.
  • 9Kim S., Huh W. T., Dasu S. Pre-announced Posted Pricing Scheme: Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Bidding Strategy [ J ]. Operations Research Letters, 2015,43 (2) : 151-160.
  • 10Leu S-S., Pham V. H. S., Pham T. H. N. Development of Reeursive Decision Making Model in Bilateral Construction Procure- ment Negotiation[ J]. Automation in Construction, 2015,53( 1 ) : 131-140.

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部