期刊文献+

经济分析中文化的表诠及其意义(上) 被引量:5

The Representation of Culture in Economic Analysis and It's Meaning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "文化"是经济分析中不可或缺的一环,但如何阐释与表达文化概念依然是一个难题。通过梳理目前经济学各领域文化维度研究的相关文献,本文分析了主流经济理论处理文化之经济后果的主要方法及其局限性,制度经济学关于文化与制度关系的逻辑阐释,新经济史对于历史背景下文化现象的关注以及博弈论视角下的文化理解。我们认为文化存在于人际间的交往行为中,通过制度过程发挥作用并对经济事实产生影响。经济学关于文化的表诠,指向一种结合经济史的丰富资料,基于真实世界中的个人交往行为,在文化场景中描绘社会经济运行脉络的制度分析。 Culture is indispensable in economic analysis. But how to represent culture in economics is still a problem. This paper gives an overview of the articles about cultural study in economic analysis, including how we explain the economic outcomes of culture in main - stream economics; how to analyze the relationship between culture and institutions; how to understand cultural phenomenon under historical background; and how to use game theory explain culture. We argue that culture is embodied by personal interaction behavior, and influences economic outcomes through institutional process. This representation of culture shows the economies based on thick descriptions theory.
作者 方钦
出处 《南方经济》 CSSCI 2013年第5期1-11,共11页 South China Journal of Economics
基金 国家社科一般项目("文化对经济活动的影响研究")资助 项目编号11BJL062
关键词 文化 信任 信念 制度 聚点 Culture Trust Belief Institution Focal Point.
  • 相关文献

参考文献47

  • 1Abrams,Burton A. and Lewis,Kenneth A.,“ Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Economic Growth : A Cross-SectionAnalysis,” Public Choice, vol. 83,no. 3/4 (1995),pp. 273-289.
  • 2Aoki, M. “‘Individual’Social Capital, ‘Social’Networks, and their Linkages to Economic Game,” the World BankWorking Paper.2009.
  • 3Aoki, M. ,“Understanding Douglass North in Game-Theoretic Language,” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 21,no. 2 (Jan..2010),pp. 139-146.
  • 4Aumann, Robert and Brandenburger, Adam, “Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium,” Econometrica, vol. 63,no. 5(Sep.,1995),pp. 1161-1180.
  • 5Banfield, Edward C.,The Moral Basis of a Backward Society,New York: Free Press, 1958.
  • 6Bisin, Alberto and Verdier, Thierry, “ ‘Beyond the Melting Pot’ ; Cultural Transmission, Marriage, and the Evolution ofEthnic and Religious Traits,” The Quarterly Joumal of Economics,vol. 115,no. 3 (Aug. , 2000), pp. 955-988.
  • 7Bowles, Samuel, “Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions,’,Joumalof Economic Literature,vol. 36,no. 1 (Mar.,1998),pp. 75-111.
  • 8Bowles, Samuel and Gintis,Herbert, “The Inheritance of Inequality,” The Joumal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 16, no. 3(Summer, 2002),pp. 3-30.
  • 9Boyd, Robert and Richerson, Peter J.,Culture and the Evolutionary Process,Chicago and London: University of ChicagoPress, 1985.
  • 10Brinkman, Richard L.,“ Culture in Neoinstitutional Economics : An Integration of Myrdal and Galbraith into the Veblen-AyresMatrix,” American Joumal of Economics and Sociology,vol. 40, no. 4 (Oct.,1981),pp. 401-413.

共引文献1

同被引文献55

  • 1韦森.经济学的性质与哲学视角审视下的经济学——一个基于经济思想史的理论回顾与展望[J].经济学(季刊),2007,6(3):945-968. 被引量:48
  • 2亨利·梅因.古代法[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009:189.
  • 3[德]卡尔·拉伦茨 陈爱娥译.《法学方法论》[M].商务印书馆,2003年版.第142页.
  • 4[美]罗伯特·考特 托罗斯·尤伦 张军译.《法和经济学》[M].上海三联书店,1994年版.第147页.
  • 5[美]科斯 盛洪 陈郁译校.《论生产的制度结构》[M].上海三联书店,1994年版.第55页.
  • 6米歇尔·福柯.规训与惩罚[M].北京:三联书店,1999.
  • 7弗兰西斯·福山.信任:社会道德与繁荣的创造[M].呼和浩特:远方出版社,1998.
  • 8费孝通.江村经济[M].北京:商务印书馆,2001.
  • 9Coase R H. The Problem of Social Cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960(3) ~ 1 -44.
  • 10Demsetz H. Toward a Theory of Property Rights [J] American EconomicReview, 1967, 57(2) :347-359.

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部