期刊文献+

手辅助腹腔镜手术在胃肠外科中的应用及适应证选择 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨手辅助腹腔镜手术在胃肠外科中的应用以及适应证的选择。方法选取2011年5月到2012年5月患有胃肠疾病患者共124例,并随机的将其分为两组,一组接受手辅助腹腔镜手术治疗,共65例。另一组为传统腹腔镜手术组,共59例。术后对比总结手辅助腹腔镜手术的应用特点和注意事项。结果通过手辅助腹腔镜手术检出患者淋巴结术为19枚/例,传统腹腔镜手术为6枚/例,二者手术时间为(123.6±1.26)min、(165.2±2.36)min;术中出血量为(145.2±2.6)ml、(162.1±2.2)ml,对比结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论手辅助腹腔镜作为一种新兴的微创手术技术,医师在进行临床治疗过程中要掌握手术的应用要求,并严格地选择适应证。
作者 张华林
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2013年第12期977-977,979,共2页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five - year follow - up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus opensurgery for colorectal cancer[ J]. Br J Surg, 2010,97 ( 11 ) : 1638 - 1645.
  • 2Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2004,350(20) :2050 -2059.
  • 3Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, et al. Hand - assisted laparoscopic ver- sus open right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2007,246(5) :728 -733.
  • 4黄祥魁.腹腔镜和开腹手术治疗结肠癌的临床效果比较[J].中国当代医药,2013,20(1):64-65. 被引量:14
  • 5王自强.手辅助腹腔镜手术在胃肠外科中的应用及适应证选择[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2012,15(8):796-798. 被引量:13

二级参考文献26

  • 1Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 2010,97( 11 ) : 1638-1645.
  • 2Chinical Outcomes of Surgery Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med, 2004,350(20):2050-2059.
  • 3Ou H. Laparoscopic-assisted mini laparatomy with colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum, 1995,38 (3) : 324-326.
  • 4Chung CC, Ng DC, Tsang WW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy : a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg, 2007,246 (5) : 728-733.
  • 5Yin WY, Wei CK, Tseng KC, et al. Open colectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted colectomy supported by hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy for resectable colorectal cancer: a comparative study with minimum follow-up of three years. Hepatogastroenterology, 2009,56(93) :998-1006.
  • 6Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy : a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc, 2004,18(4) :577-581.
  • 7Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg, 2004,240 (6) : 984-992.
  • 8Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctoeolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc, 2007,21(8) : 1301-1307.
  • 9Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum, 2008,51 (6) :818-828.
  • 10Targarona EM, Gracia E, Garriga J, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy : applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surg Endosc, 2002, 16(2) : 234-239.

共引文献25

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部