侦查监督之程序性制裁可行性探析

The Feasibility of Procedural Sanction’s Investigation and Supervision

检察权理论强调扩权与限权并重,扩权即扩大检察机关的法律监督权,尤指扩大、强化侦查监督权。在我国的司法实践中,侦查监督的效果差强人意,这有来自各方面的原因,如监督范围不周延、监督内容片面,多为事后监督、实体性监督等。《关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定》、新《刑事诉讼法》将检察机关作为排除非法证据的主体之一,而非法证据排除是程序性制裁的典型代表,这给了我们一个新思路,即从程序性制裁的视角来强化侦查监督,通过宣告侦查机关违法侦查行为的无效来震慑侦查机关的违法侦查行为。

Procuratorial theory emphasizes both the expansion and limit of rights.Expansion means the expansion of the legal supervision,especially expanding and strengthening the supervision of investigation right.However,in the judicial practice,the effect is unsatisfactory,and the reasons are a lot,such as limited scope,incomplete content,post supervision,and substantial supervision etc.The provisions of the illegal evidence elimination and the new criminal procedure law regulate the procuratorate as one of the main body to the exclusion of illegal evidence,and the exclusion of illegal evidence is a typical representative of procedural sanctions.This gives us another thought,that we can strengthen investigation supervision from the perspective of procedural sanctions,that is,we can deter the illegal behavior of investigation organ through declaring the illegal investigation behavior invalid.