期刊文献+

狐蝠科3种蝙蝠舌长度及结构比较 被引量:2

Tongue Length and Structure of Three Bat Species in Pteropodidae
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨旧大陆食果和食蜜蝙蝠的食性类型不同是否造成其取食器官舌长度及结构的差异,本研究以2种食果蝙蝠犬蝠(Cynopterus sphinx)和棕果蝠(Rousettus leschenaultii)以及1种食蜜蝙蝠长舌果蝠(Eonycteris spelaea)为研究对象,比较了这3个物种间舌的差异。犬蝠、棕果蝠和长舌果蝠伸入直径为2 cm试管的最大舌长度L1(包括伸入试管的吻部和吻部以外的舌长)分别为(29.19±0.52)mm、(35.05±0.82)mm、(49.34±1.64)mm;伸出吻端外部的舌长L3分别为(16.25±0.53)mm、(19.25±0.79)mm、(31.88±1.56)mm;与体重转换后的最大舌长度,即转换L1分别为(8.57±0.17)mm/g1/3、(7.90±0.27)mm/g1/3、(12.41±0.40)mm/g1/3;与体重转换后的伸出吻端外部的舌长,即转换L3分别为(4.77±0.16)mm/g1/3、(4.34±0.22)mm/g1/3、(8.01±0.38)mm/g1/3;与体重转换后的解剖舌长分别为(5.56±0.16)mm/g1/3、(5.35±0.14)mm/g1/3、(6.65±0.38)mm/g1/3。此5个参数种间比较均差异显著,食蜜类的长舌果蝠的5个参数均显著长于食果类犬蝠和棕果蝠的相应参数。通过比较3种蝙蝠的舌结构发现,长舌果蝠的舌尖尖细且具有毛刷状丝状乳头结构,舌面及两侧凹槽较多;犬蝠和棕果蝠的舌尖钝圆,舌面乳头和凹槽较少而平缓。本文结果表明,旧大陆食蜜蝙蝠与食果蝙蝠在舌长度和舌结构上存在明显差异,可能与捕食行为的差异有关。 We studied differences between the size and surface of tongue among three of Old World bats ( Pteropodidae, Chiroptera) , two frugivorous species ( Cynopterus sphinx and Rousettus leschenauItii ) and one nectarivorous species (Eonycteris spelaea). The maximum tongue length were measured by two measurements of length inserted into the tube with diameter in 2 cm. L1 (including the snout and the tongue outside snout), and L3 (tongue length outside snout). The maximum of tongue length L1 was 29.19 ± 0.52 mm for C. sphinx, 35.05 ±0. 82 mm for R. leschenaultii, and 49. 34 ± 1.64 mm for E. spelaea; L3 in the three species were 16. 25 ±0. 53 ram, 19. 25 ±0. 79 ram, 31.88 ± 1.56 ram, respectively. The two length measurements were converted with weight and resulted in 8.57 ± 0. 17 mm/g^(1/3) , 7.90± 0.27 mm/g^(1/3) , 12.41 ± 0.40 mm/g^(1/3) for L1 in the three species and 4.77 ±0. 16 mm/g^(1/3) , 4.34 ±0. 22 mm/g^(1/3) , 8. 01 ± 0. 38 mm/g^(1/3) for L3 ; the anatomical tongue length after conversion were 5.56 ± 0. 16 mm/g1/3 , 5, 35 ±0. 14 mm/g1/3 , 6. 65 ± 0. 38 mm/gt/3 , respectively. There were significant difference in these five variables among the three species, i.e. the value of five variables in nectarivorous bat were significantly longer than those of the other two frugivorous bats. By comparing tongue structure, we found that E. spelaea had a long and tapering brush-tipped tongue with many grooves on the surface and two sides, while the tips of C. sphinx and R. leschenaultia' s tongues were blunt and with less grooves and brush structures. Our results indicated that the tongue length and structure between Old World nectarivorous and frugivorous bats were different, which may result from the difference of foraging behaviour.
出处 《动物学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期338-344,共7页 Chinese Journal of Zoology
基金 广东省昆虫研究所优秀青年人才基金项目(No.GDEI-yxqn201101) 广州市珠江科技新星专项(No.2011J2200027)
关键词 舌长度 舌结构 食蜜蝙蝠 食果蝙蝠 捕食行为 食性差异 Tongue length Tongue structure Nectarivorous bat Fructivorous bat Foraging behavior Feeding habit difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Bumrungsri S. 2007. Feeding biology of a nectarivo:'ous bat, Eonycteris spelaea and its pollination effectiveness to durian and Parkia. Ph. Doctoral Dissertation, Thailand: Prince ofSongkla University, 1 - 61.
  • 2Bumrnngsri S, Sripaoraya E, Chongsiri T, et al. 2009. The pollination ecology of durian ( Durio zibethinus, Bombacaceae ) in southern Thailand. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 25 (1) : 85 -92.
  • 3Dobat K, Peikert-Holle T. 1985. Bluten und Fledermause: Bestaubang Dutch Fleder Mause und Flughunde (Chiroptcrn- philic). Frankfurt: Waldemar Kramer Vcdag, 370.
  • 4Elangovan V, Marimuthu G, Kunz T H. 2000. Nectar-feeding behavior in the short-nosed fruit bat Cynopterus sphinx (Pteropodidae). Acta Chirnptcrologica, 2 ( 1 ) : 1 - 5.
  • 5Felnsinger P. 1987. Approaches to nectarivore-plant interactions in the New World. Revlsta Chilena de Historia Natural, 60 : 285 - 319.
  • 6Fenster C B, Armbrnster W S, Wilson P, et al. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35 (1) : 3"75 -403.
  • 7Fleming T H, Geiselman C, Kress W J. 2009. The evolution of bat pollination: a phylogenetic perspective. Annals of Botany, 104(6) : 1017 - 1043.
  • 8Fleming T H, Heithaus E R. 1981. Frugivorous bats, seed shadows, and the structure of tropical forests. Biotropica, 13 (2): 45 -53.
  • 9Fleming T H, Muchhala N. 2008. Nectar-feeding bird and bat niches in two worlds: pantropical comparisons of vertebrate pollination systems. Journal of Biogeography, 35(5) : 764 - 780.
  • 10Freeman P W. 1995. Nectarivorous feeding mechanisms in bats. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 56(3): 439 - 463.

二级参考文献45

共引文献26

同被引文献24

  • 1唐占辉,盛连喜,曹敏,梁冰,张树义.西双版纳地区犬蝠和棕果蝠食性的初步研究[J].兽类学报,2005,25(4):367-372. 被引量:19
  • 2陈忠,蒙以航,周锋,李玉春.海南岛棕果蝠的活动节律与食性[J].兽类学报,2007,27(2):112-119. 被引量:12
  • 3朱光剑,唐占辉,梁冰,张信文.海口地区犬蝠冬季食性及栖宿地类型[J].动物学杂志,2007,42(4):22-27. 被引量:6
  • 4Aguirre L F,Herrel A,Van DR,Matthysen E.2003.The implications of food hardness for diet in bats.Functional Ecology,17(2):201-212.
  • 5Brown J S.1988.Patch use as an indicator of habitat preference,predation risk,and competition.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology,22(1):37-47.
  • 6Elangovan V,Priya E Y S,Raghuram H,Marimuthu G.2007.Wing morphology and flight development in the short-nosed fruit bat Cynopterus sphinx.Zoology,110:189-196.
  • 7Fleming T H.1991.The relationship between body size diet and habitat use in frugivorous bats,genus Carollia(Phyllostomidae).Journal of Mammalogy,72(3):493-501.
  • 8Hu Y M,Tang Z H,Ding X M,Song C T,Cao M,Ma X F.2010.The study on feeding behavior of Cynopterus sphinx on Ficus hispida.Journal of Northeast Normal University(Natural Science Edition),42(3):132-138.(in Chinese).
  • 9Jensen K,Mayntz D,Toft S,Clissold F J,Hunt J,Raubenheimer D,Simpson S 1.2012.Optimal foraging for specific nutrients iu predatory beetles.Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences,279(1736):2212-2218.
  • 10Kalko E K V,Herre E A,Handley J C O.1996.Relation of fig fruit characteristics to fruit-eating bats in the New and Old World tropics.Journal of Biogeography,23(4):565-576.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部