期刊文献+

液体复苏对感染性休克患者内稳态及APACHE Ⅱ评分的影响及其意义 被引量:3

Effects of Fluid Resuscitation on Homeostasis and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationsⅡof Patients with Septic Shock
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察液体复苏对感染性休克患者血气分析、酸碱平衡、电解质、急性生理和慢性健康状况评估Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分的影响,进而分析它们与复苏液体总量的相关性,并探讨其临床意义。方法 24h达标(中心静脉压8~12mmHg、平均动脉血压≥65mmHg)复苏治疗21例符合本研究入选标准的感染性休克患者,前瞻性自身比较复苏治疗前及复苏治疗24h后血气分析、酸碱平衡、电解质及APACHEⅡ评分,直线回归分析电解质、酸碱、血气分析指标及APACHEⅡ评分与复苏液体总量的相关性。结果 21例感染性休克患者24h内复苏液体总量为(7775±1735)mL(5320~11028mL),复苏达标时间为(18.09±4.57)h。复苏治疗24h后血Na+(mmol/L)和Cl-(mmol/L)均较治疗前明显升高(Na+:138.71±5.67比135.62±7.23,P=0.024;Cl-:109.10±4.90比101.67±8.59,P=0.000);血pH值、红细胞比容(Hct,%)、阴离子隙(AG,mmol/L)、乳酸(mmol/L)及APACHEⅡ评分(分)均较治疗前明显下降(pH:7.31±0.05比7.37±0.06,P=0.000;Hct:28.48±2.56比32.76±9.19,P=0.049;AG:8.33±3.45比14.17±8.83,P=0.004;乳酸:1.66±0.89比2.96±1.23,P=0.001;APACHEⅡ评分:10.90±3.73比17.24±4.06,P=0.000)。血Cl-水平与复苏液体总量呈正相关(r=0.717,P<0.01)、其余电解质、酸碱、血气分析指标及APACHEⅡ评分与复苏液体总量无相关性(P>0.05)。结论感染性休克患者应制定适宜的液体复苏目标,并监测内环境的变化,尽可能控制晶体液输入量及不良内环境影响。复苏治疗减轻病情与输注液体总量无明显相关。 Objective To evaluate the effects and the clinical significances of liquid resuscitation on blood gas analysis,acid-base balance,electrolytes,acute physiology and chronic health evaluationsⅡ(APACHEⅡ) score of patients with septic shock,and then to analyze the relations between serum chlorine(Cl-) level and APACHEⅡscore and the volume of liquid resuscitation.Methods According to the target of resuscitation(centre venous pressure 8-12?mm Hg and mean arterial pressure≥65?mm Hg),21 patients with septic shock received enough fluid for resuscitation during 24?h.The results of blood gas analysis,acid-base balance,electrolytes,and APACHE Ⅱ score were compared between pre-resuscitation and 24?h post-resuscitation by self-controlled prospective study.The relationships of the level of serum Cl-and APACHEⅡ score with the volume of liquid used in resuscitation were analyzed.Results The mean resuscitation duration was(18.09±4.57) h,and the volume of liquid during 24 h resuscitation was 5 320-11 028?mL with mean volume of(7 775±1 735) mL in 21 patients with septic shock.Serum sodium(Na+,mmol/L) and Cl-?(mmol/L) levels of post-resuscitation were significant higher than those of pre-resuscitation(Na+:138.71±5.67 versus 135.62±7.23,P=0.024;Cl-:109.10±4.90 versus 101.67±8.59,P=0.000).Compared with the levels of pre-resuscitation,the blood pH value,hematocrit(Hct,%),anion gap(AG,mmol/L),lactic acid(mmol/L),and APACHE Ⅱ score significantly decreased(pH:7.31±0.05 versus 7.37±0.06,P=0.000;Hct:28.48±2.56 versus 32.76± 9.19,P=0.049;AG:8.33±3.45 versus 14.17±8.83,P=0.004;lactic acid:1.66±0.89 versus 2.96±1.23,P= 0.001;APACHEⅡ:10.90±3.73 versus 17.24±4.06,P=0.000) after 24?h resuscitation.The correlation analysis showed that the level of serum Cl-was positively correlated with the volume of liquid used in resuscitation(r=0.717, P0.01).However,there was no correlation between APACHEⅡscore and the volume of liquid used in resuscitation(P 0.05).Conclusions The target of liquid resuscitation in patients with septic shock should be cautiously determined,including control of the volume of crystal liquid for resuscitation,in order to avoid acid-base imbalance or hyperchloraemia.At the same time,the change in internal environment should be monitored.An optimistic fluid resuscitation to decrease APACHE Ⅱ score in patients with septic shock is unrelated to the volume of liquid resuscitation.
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期508-511,共4页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 液体复苏 感染性休克 内稳态 急性生理和慢性健康状况评估Ⅱ评分 Fluid resuscitation Septic shock Homeostasis Acute physiology and chronic health evaluations Ⅱ score
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kellum JA. Fluid resuscitation and hyperchloremic acidosis in experimental sepsis: improved short-term survival and acid-base balance with Hextend compared with saline [J]. Crit Care Med, 2002, 30(2): 300-305.
  • 2倪海滨,李维勤,柯路,童智慧,徐晓帆,丁威威,聂垚.液体复苏对重症急性胰腺炎患者内稳态影响的临床分析[J].中国危重病急救医学,2010(9):522-524. 被引量:22
  • 3Hartog CS, Bauer M, Reinhart K. The efficacy and safety of colloid resuscitation in the critically ill [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2011, 112(1): 156-164.
  • 4Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012 [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2013, 39(2): 165-228.
  • 5李峰,孙华,韩旭东.不同液体对感染性休克早期液体复苏的影响研究[J].中国危重病急救医学,2008,20(8):472-475. 被引量:29
  • 6Marik PE. Surviving sepsis: going beyond the gmdelmes [.J ]. Ann Intensive Care, 2011, 1(1): 17-22.
  • 7Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, et al. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality [J]. Crit Care Med, 2011, 39(2): 259-265.
  • 8Maitland K, Kiguli S, Opoka RO, et al. Mortality ailer fluid bolus in African children with severe infection [J]. N Engl J Med, 2011, 364(26): 2483-2495.
  • 9王爱田,刘芳,朱曦,么改琦.优化的液体治疗策略对感染性休克患者预后影响的系统评价[J].中国危重病急救医学,2012,24(1):13-17. 被引量:33
  • 10陈齐红,郑瑞强,林华,卢年芳,邵俊,於江泉,窦英茹,汪华玲.不同液体管理策略对感染性休克患者病死率的影响[J].中国危重病急救医学,2011,23(3):142-145. 被引量:36

二级参考文献66

共引文献106

同被引文献16

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部