期刊文献+

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术经腹腔腹膜前与完全腹膜外手术入路疗效的meta分析 被引量:11

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Versus Totally Extraperitoneal Approach of Inguinal Hernia Repair:A Meta Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前(TAPP)和完全腹膜外(TEP)两种手术入路在原发性腹股沟疝患者中的治疗效果。方法制定严格的纳入标准和排除标准,收集腹腔镜TAPP与TEP原发性腹股沟疝修补术临床疗效比较的随机对照试验,按照Cochrane协作网推荐的方法对纳入研究进行系统分析。结果 7篇随机对照试验(552例患者)纳入分析,TAPP组302例,TEP组250例。TAPP组与TEP组相比较,2组在手术时间〔WMD=8.49,95%CI(-1.37,18.35),P=0.09〕、术后住院时间〔SMD=0.11,95%CI(-0.12,0.34),P=0.34〕、术后复发率〔OR=1.37,95%CI(0.36,5.20),P=0.64〕、并发症(切口感染、尿潴留)发生率〔切口感染:OR=4.27,95%CI(0.85,21.57),P=0.08;尿潴留:OR=0.61,95%CI(0.21,1.78),P=0.36〕方面差异均无统计学意义,但2组在术后24 h疼痛方面,TEP组术后疼痛更轻〔WMD=0.72,95%CI(0.58,0.87),P<0.000 01〕。结论目前证据显示,TEP术后24 h疼痛程度比TAPP术更轻;手术时间、术后住院时间、术后复发及并发症方面2组差异无统计学意义,但仍需更多高质量的大样本随机对照试验进一步证实。 Objective To evaluate the clinical application of the different operative approaches of the laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia and provide a more rational and scientific choice for the surgeon.Methods The strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were set up.All the randomized controlled trials(RCT) about laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal(TEP) approaches of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair were collected.Meta an-alysis was performed according to the recommendation by the Cochrane handbook.Results Seven RCTs including 552 patients were analyzed,who were divided into TAPP group(n=302) and TEP group(n=250).Compared with TAPP group,there were no significant differences of the operation time?(WMD=8.49,95% CI(-1.37,18.35),P=0.09),postoperative hospitalization?(SMD=0.11,95% CI(-0.12,0.34),P=0.34),postoperative recurrence rate(OR=1.37,95% CI(0.36,5.20),P=0.64),and complications(incision infection,urinary retention)(Incision infection:OR=4.27,95% CI(0.85,21.57),P=0.08;Urinary retention:OR=0.61,95% CI(0.21,1.78),P=0.36)?in the TEP group.But the postoperative 24 h pain in the TEP group was significantly milder than that in the TAPP group?(WMD=0.72,95% CI(0.58,0.87),P0.000 01)?.Conclusions The currently available evidence shows that postoperative 24 h pain in the TEP group is more milder than that in the TAPP group.The time of the operation,postoperative hospitalization,postoperative recurrence,and complications are no significant differences between TAPP group and TEP group.Large-scale,high-quality RCTs are still needed to confirm or refuse the available evidence.
作者 林志华
出处 《中国普外基础与临床杂志》 CAS 2013年第5期517-524,共8页 Chinese Journal of Bases and Clinics In General Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 完全腹膜外 经腹腔腹膜前 腹股沟疝 META分析 Laparoscopy Totally extraperitoneal Transabdominal preperitoneal Inguinal hernia Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Ger R. The management of certain abdominal herniae by intra- abdominal closure of the neck of the sac. Preliminary communi- cation [J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1982, 64(5): 342-344.
  • 2Dion YM, Morin J. Laparoscopic inguinal hemiorrhaphy [J]. Can J Surg, 1992, 35(2): 209-212.
  • 3McKeman JB, Laws HL. Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach [J]. Surg Endosc, 1993, 7(1): 26-28.
  • 4McCormack K, Wake BL, Fraser C, et al. Transabdominal pre- peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review [J]. Hernia, 2005, 9(2): 109-114.
  • 5Wake BL, McCormack K, Fraser C, et al. Transabdominal pre- peritoneal (TAPP) vs totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2005, (1): CD004703.
  • 6Krishna A, Misra MC, Bansal VK, et aL Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach: a prospective randomized contr- olled trial [J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(3): 639-649.
  • 7Gong K, Zhang N, Lu Y, et al. Comparison of the open tension- free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilat- eral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial [J]. Surg Endosc, 2011,25(1): 234-239.
  • 8Hamza Y, Gabr E, Hammadi H, et al. Four-arm randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open hernia repairs [ J ]. Int J Stag, 2010, 8(1): 25-28.
  • 9毛志海,李健文,王明亮,陆爱国,胡伟国,蒋渝,郑民华.两种不同腔镜腹股沟疝修补术CO_2充气对血流动力学与呼吸功能的影响[J].外科理论与实践,2008,13(3):223-226. 被引量:4
  • 10Pokomy H, Klingler A, Schmid T, et al. Recurrence and compli- cations after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial [J]. Hernia, 2008, 12(4): 385-389.

二级参考文献28

  • 1戎祯祥,陆光生,陈小伍,剧永乐,伍锦浩,朱达坚,张才铭,耿岩,欧阳满照.腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片植入术治疗腹股沟疝269例报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(12):1142-1143. 被引量:28
  • 2吴泰相,刘关键.隐蔽分组(分配隐藏)和盲法的概念、实施与报告[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(3):222-225. 被引量:174
  • 3李健文,郑民华,李华青,张辉,胡伟国,王明亮,陆爱国.腹腔镜全腹膜外补片植入术中补片固定与不固定的随机对照试验[J].中华普通外科杂志,2007,22(6):440-442. 被引量:54
  • 4Lau H,Patil N G. Selective non-stapling of mesh during unilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: a case-control study[J]. Arch Surg, 2003,138 : 1352-1355.
  • 5Higgins J P,Thompson S G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta analysis[J]. Star Med,2002,21 : 1539-1558.
  • 6Ferzli G S,Frezza E E,Pecoraro A M Jr,Ahern K D. Prospective randomized study of stapled versus unstapled mesh in a laparoseopie preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1999,188 : 461-465.
  • 7Koch C A,Greenlee S M,Larson D R,Harrington J R,Farley D R. Randomized prospective study of totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: fixation versus no fixation of mesh[J]. JSLS, 2006,10 : 457-460.
  • 8Moreno-Egea A, Torralba Martinez J A, Morales Cuenca G, Aguayo Albasini J L. Randomized clinical trial of fixation vs nonfixation of mesh in total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty[J]. Arch Surg,2004,139:1376-1379.
  • 9Parshad R,Kumar R, Hazrah P, Bal S. A randomized comparison of the early outcome of stapled and unstapled techniques of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. JSLS, 2005,9 : 403-407.
  • 10Smith A I,Royston C M,Sedman P C. Stapled and nonstapled laparoscopie transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair. A prospective randomized trial[J]. Surg Endosc, 1999,13 : 804-806.

共引文献11

同被引文献77

引证文献11

二级引证文献96

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部