保险诈骗罪第四款解释路径之选择

The Choice of Interpretative Route about the Fourth Paragraph of the Crime of Insurance Fraud

保险诈骗罪第四款的规定不是片面共犯的立法体现,因而片面共犯理论无法对其性质做出合理解释。同样,想象竞合和法规竞合理论,法律拟制和注意规定理论由于自身的不周延亦难以给出合理的解释。因此,在选择保险诈骗罪第四款的解释路径时,需要立足于法律文本,依据大竞合理论进行解释。

The fourth paragraph of the crime of insurance fraud is not the legislative embodiment of unilateral com- plicity, therefore, the theory of unilateral complicity cant give a reasonable interpretation to the nature of the fourth paragraph. And, because of their own defects, the theory of imaginative joiner and coincidence of articles, legal fic- tion and provision of attention also cant give a reasonable interpretation. Therefore, when we choose the interpretative route about the fourth paragraph of the crime of insurance fraud, basing on the legal text, we can make the reasonable interpretation by the theory of large coincidence.