期刊文献+

海州湾生态系统健康诊断 被引量:3

Health Diagnosis of Haizhou Bay Neritic Ecosystem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据开敞海湾浅海生态系统特征,构建了包含环境现状、环境风险、环境背景、系统结构功能和系统稳定性5类诊断指标以及24个诊断因子的浅海生态系统健康诊断指标体系,并采用层次分析法对海州湾浅海生态系统2009年12月和2010年11月的健康状况进行诊断。结果表明,2009年12月和2010年11月海州湾浅海生态系统的综合健康指数值分别为0.500~0.689和0.553~0.750,浅海生态系统处于亚健康~较健康状态,近岸海域基本处于亚健康状态,离岸海域基本处于较健康状态,近岸海域生态系统健康水平低于离岸海域,这与近岸海域开发活动干扰多以及环境压力大有关。 In light of the characteristics of an open bay neritic ecosystem, a neritic ecosystem health diagnosis index system was established consisting of five categories of diagnosis indices and 24 diagnostic factors. The diagnosis indices are environment status quo, environmental risk, environment background, ecosystem structure and function, and ecosystem stability. Health of the neritic ecosystem of Haizhou Bay in December 2009 and in November 2010 was primarily diag- nosed. Results show that the neritic ecosystem health diagnosis index system is workable, and the integrated health index value of the neritic ecosystem of Haizhou Bay was in the range of 0. 500 - 0. 689 in December 2009, and of 0. 553 - 0. 750 in November 2010, indicating that the neritic ecosystem was in a sub-healthy to fairly healthy condition, and the off-shore area was better than the immediately offshore area in health condition, which was supposedly related to the interference and environmental pressure caused by the exploitation of the offshore area.
出处 《生态与农村环境学报》 CAS CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期301-310,304-310,共10页 Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment
基金 海洋公益性行业科研专项(200905011)
关键词 浅海生态系统 生态健康诊断 空间分布 海州湾 neritic ecosystem ecosystem health diagnosis spatial distribution Haizhou Bay
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献137

共引文献187

同被引文献46

  • 1韩青鹏,单秀娟,陈云龙,金显仕,刘凯,胡贝尔,崔培东.山东近海产卵场健康状况评价体系[J].中国水产科学,2022,29(1):79-90. 被引量:5
  • 2许罕多.资源衰退下的我国海洋捕捞业产量增长——基于1956年-2011年渔业数据的实证分析[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013(5):86-93. 被引量:9
  • 3阮俊杰,黄沈发,王卿,王敏.基于遥感信息的二十年来上海市滩涂湿地时空动态分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(S2):94-100. 被引量:6
  • 4叶属峰,刘星,丁德文.长江河口海域生态系统健康评价指标体系及其初步评价[J].海洋学报,2007,29(4):128-136. 被引量:60
  • 5SUZANNE J P, RODNEY M F. Marine ecosystem connec tionsEssential indicators of healthy, productive and biologi cally diverse seas[J].Biogeochemistry, 2013,113(5) : 1-7.
  • 6ROBERT C.Ecosystem health and ecological engineering[J]. Ecological Engineering,2012,45(8) .-24-29.
  • 7PAUl. J F, KATHLEEN L, KATRINAL L M, et al. Forest figures:Ecosystem services valuation and policy evaluation in developing countries[J].Review of Environmental Economics and Policy,2013,6(1) :20- 24.
  • 8RALF S,BRIAN F,BENJAMIN B, et al.Form follows func- tion? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessment based on reviews and cade studies[J].Eeological Indicators, 2012(21):145 -154.
  • 9TSUNGAI A Z,MARK P R,ANTHONY J B,et al.A quali tative ecological risk assessment of the Invasive Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus in a sub-tropical African River System (Limpopo River, South Africa) [J]. Aquatic Conservation, 2013,23(1) :51-64.
  • 10WANG C,QU A Y,WANG P F,et al. Estuarine ecosystem health assessment based on the DPSIR framework: A case of the Yangtze Estuary, China [ J ]. Journal of Costal Research, 2013(65) :1236-1241.

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部