期刊文献+

高龄老年患者置入起搏器的安全性及可行性研究 被引量:3

Safety and feasibility of implanted pacemaker in elderly patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨高龄老年患者置入起搏器的安全性和可行性,以及如何预防其并发症的发生。方法对2009年1月至2011年12月共计256例初次置人起搏器患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,依据年龄不同,分为高龄组(〉75岁,168例)和低龄组(60~74岁,148例)。观察术中、术后起搏器阈值、感知情况,随访术中及术后7d、3个月、半年穿刺并发症及电极脱位、感染等并发症发生情况。结果2组患者性别、糖尿病病史、BMI、心房感知和起搏阈值、右心室感知和起搏阈值等方面差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。高龄组患者年龄、肺部疾病史患者所占比例均明显高于低龄组老年患者[(84±9)岁比(68±7)岁,63,9%(69/108)比10.1%(15/148)],差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。2组发生并发症共计13例,低年龄组6例,高龄组7例。与起搏器置入相关并发症5例,低龄组2例,1例穿刺过程中出现气胸,1例术后7d内出现囊袋血肿;高龄组3例,1例置入术后24h出现气胸,1例置入过程中出现血气胸,1例术后5个月发生起搏器感染。与电极导线相关并发症2例,低龄组和高龄组各I例。与起搏器相关并发症6例,其中低龄组3例,分别为电池提前耗竭2例,起搏器综合征1例;高龄组3例,分别为起搏器移位2例,起搏器感知、起搏功能障碍1例。2组并发症发生情况比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论高龄患者置人起搏器安全可靠,但同时要了解高龄老年患者的特殊性以及注意围手术期管理。 Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of implanted pacemaker in elderly patients. Methods From January 2009 to December 2011, a total of 256 cases of primary implanted pacemaker patients were enrolled. According to the age of the defined standards, 256 patients were divided into 2 groups : 108 cases in old group and 148 patients in young group. Threshold value, perception perioperative and postoperative, puncture com- plications, electrode dislocation, infection and complications were observed. Results Gender, diabetes, body mass index, atrial pacemaker threshold value and perception, ventricnlar pacemaker threshold value and perception had no significant differences between 2 groups. The age and the patients with lung diseases in old group were obvi- ously more than those in young group[ (84 -4-9 )old years vs (68 + 7 )old years, 63.9% (69/108) vs 10.1% (15/ 148), all P 〈 0.05 ]. The patients with complications in two groups were 13 cases, including 6 cases of young group and 7 cases of old group. The complications associated with implanted pacemaker was 2 cases in young group and 3 cases in old group. The electrode wire related complications included 1 case in each group, and pacemaker related complications were 3 cases in each group; there was no significant differences between two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Implanted pacemaker in elderly patients is safe and feasible, but we should understand the characteristics of the elderly patients and pay attention to perioperative and postoperative management.
出处 《中国医药》 2013年第6期767-769,共3页 China Medicine
基金 首都医学发展基金(中医药类)资助项目(SF-2009-11-12)
关键词 起搏器 高龄 囊袋感染 Pacemaker Elder Pocket infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Armaganijan LV,Toff WD,Nielsen JC,et al. Are elderly patientsat increased risk of complications following pacemaker implantation?A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2012,35(2) :131-134.
  • 2Stevenson RT, Lugg D, Gray R, et al. Pacemaker implantation inthe extreme elderly. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012,33 ( 1 ):51-58.
  • 3张建军,杨新春,胡大一,商丽华,汪爱虎,陈明.462例永久起搏器置入术并发症的相关因素分析及防治对策[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2004,18(6):456-457. 被引量:64
  • 4Johansen JB,j0rgensen OD, M0ller M, et al. Infection after pace-maker implantation : infection rates and risk factors associated withinfection in a population-based cohort study of 46299 consecutivepatients. Eur Heart J, 2011,32(8) :991-998.
  • 5郭继鸿,许原,李学斌.起搏电极导线脱位的临床探讨[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2002,16(1):8-10. 被引量:70
  • 6Rauwolf T, Guenther M, Hass N, et al. Ventricular oversensing in518 patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators : incidence,com-plications ,and solutions. Europace, 2007,9(11) :1041-1047.
  • 7Elkayara LU, Koehler JL, Sheldon TJ, et al. The influence of atri-al and ventricular pacing on the incidence of atrial fibrillation : ameta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2011,34(12):1593-1599.
  • 8Minamiguchi H,Nanto S, Onishi T, et al. Low atrial septal pacingwith dual-chamber pacemakers reduces atrial fibrillation in sick si-nus syndrome. J Cardiol, 2011,57(2) :223-230.
  • 9Barrett TW, Abraham RL, Jenkins CA, et al. Risk factors forbradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation in patients with atrialfibrillation. Am J Cardiol, 2012,110(9):1315-1321.

二级参考文献5

共引文献118

同被引文献40

  • 1刘华芬,王晓红,向晋涛,叶丽娟.与起搏器有关的并发症案例报道10年回顾分析[J].中国心脏起搏与心电生理杂志,2007,21(4):370-373. 被引量:23
  • 2Erdogan O, Hunuk B. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: an alternative, safe, and effective pacing site. J Long Term Eff Med Implants, 2010,20: 13-2l.
  • 3Frias PA, Corvera JS, Schmarkey L, et al. Evaluation of my- ocardial performance with conventional single-site ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing in a canine model of atrioventric- ular block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2003,14 : 996-1000.
  • 4Lewicka-Nowak E, Dabrowska-Kugacka A, Tybura S, et al. Right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pac-ing : prospective, randomised, long-term clinical and echocar- diographic evaluation. Kardiol Pol, 2006,64 : 1082 - 1091,1092 - 1083.
  • 5Ronn F, Kesek M, Karp K, et al. Right ventrieular lead posi- tioning does not influence the benefits of cardiac resynchroniza- tion therapy in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Europaee, 2011,13 : 1747-1752.
  • 6Skadsberg ND, Kaiser DR, Fischer TM, et al. Global eleetro- physiological and hemodynamie assessment of ventrieular pacing employing non-contact mapping. J Interv Card Eleetrophysiol, 2009,26: 185-194.
  • 7Stambler BS, Ellenbogen K, Zhang X, et al. Right ventricular outflow ve1"sus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with conges- tive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electmphysi- ol,2003, 14: 1180-1186.
  • 8Su Y, Pan W, Sun A, et al. Is the optimal atrioventricular delay paced from right ventricular outflow tract different from that from fight ventricular apex? Int J Cardiol,2010, 140:245- 246.
  • 9Tse HF, Yu C, Wong KK, et al. Functional abnormalities in patients with permanent right ventricular pacing: the effect of sites of electrical stimulation. J Am Coil Cardiol,2002,40: 1451 - 1458.
  • 10Wang F, Shi H, Sun Y, et al. Right ventricular outflow pacing induces less regional wall motion abnormalities in the left ventricle compared with apical pacing. Europaee,2012,14:351- 357.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部