期刊文献+

枸橼酸抗凝在持续缓慢低效血液透析中的疗效和安全性 被引量:40

The safety and efficacy of regional citrate anticoagulation in sustained low efficiency dialysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察枸橼酸抗凝应用于持续缓慢低效血液透析(SLED)的安全性及有效性。方法前瞻性观察四川大学华西医院2011年8月至2012年9月收治的45例急性肾损伤或终末期肾病患者。所有患者血管通路均采用颈/股静脉留置双腔导管,采用费森尤斯4008sARrTplus透析机进行SLED,治疗时间为8h。4%枸橼酸钠以130ml/h由动脉端泵人,血流量150ml/min,无钙透析液流量200ml/min,10%葡萄糖酸钙以40ml/h静脉端泵入。分别在0、2、5h测定枸橼酸浓度,并观察外周血及透析器后血清游离钙水平。结果45例患者行SLED治疗162例次,除2例次患者分别在治疗4h及6h时出现1次透析器Ⅲ。凝血需更换透析管路外,余160例次(98.8%)SLED均顺利完成。0h枸橼酸浓度为(0.14±0.06)mmol/L,虽然2h及5h外周血枸橼酸浓度轻度升高,但两组间差异无明显统计学意义[(1.08±0.12)mmo/L比(1.11±0.17)mmoL/L,P〉0.05]。0、2、5h的外周血游离钙水平分别为(1.04±0.13)mmo/L、(1.074-0.23)mmo/L及(1.04±0.24)mmol/L,组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。2h及5h滤器后游离钙水平分别为(0.31±0.04)mmo/L及(0.29±0.03)mmo/L。2h和5h的跨膜压分别为(104.54±17.8)mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa)和(109.3±20.1)mm Hg,两组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。5h测定外周血凝血酶原时间及活化部分凝血活酶时间与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。在SLED治疗过程中未出现出血、血小板减少、心律失常、高钠血症、代谢性碱中毒及低血压事件。结论枸橼酸抗凝在SLED应用中安全有效,在保证有效的局部抗凝过程下不影响体内的凝血功能,为临床医生提供了一种新型的SLED抗凝方式。 Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of regional citrate anticoagulation in sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLED). Methods A total of 45 patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) or end stage renal disease (ESRD) admitted in our hospital from August 2011 to September 2012 were prospectively enrolled in this study. All the patients received SLED treatment by Fresenius 4008sARrTplus dialyzer through either femoral or internal jugular venous catheter, with each session of SLED treatment lasting for 8 hours. All the patients were pumped in 4% tri-sodium citrate solution through the arterial line at 130 ml/hour and 10% calcium gluconate through the venous line at 40 ml/hour. The blood flow was 150 mL/minute while the calcium-free dialysate was delivered at 200 ml/minute. Systemic citrate concentration, peripheral and post dialyzer ionized calcium levels at 0, 2 and 5 hour were recorded. Results All the 45 patients underwent 162 sessions of SLED with 2 were discontinued due to Ⅲ° dialyzer coagulation, and other 160 SLED sessions (98.8%) were all successfully performed. The systemic citrate concentration at 0 hour was (0. 14 ± 0. 06) mmol/L, the systemic citrate concentrations at 2 and 5 hour were sightly increased while no statistical difference was found[ (1.08 ± 0. 12)mmol/L vs (1.11 ± 0. 17) mmol/L, P 〉 0. 05 ]. The 0, 2, 5 hour peripheral blood ionized calcium levels were ( 1.04 ± 0. 13 ) mmol/L, ( 1.07 ± 0. 23 ) mmol/L and ( 1.04 ± 0. 24 ) mmol/L, respectively, with no significant difference ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The post dialyzer ionized calcium levels were (0. 31±0. 04) mmol/L at 2 hour and (0. 29±0. 03) mmol/L at 5 hour. The transmembrane pressure at 2 hour was ( 104. 5 ± 17.8) mm Hg( 1 mm Hg = 0. 133 kPa) , and ( 109. 3 ± 20. 1 ) mm Hg at 5 hour, however the increase was not of statistical significance ( P 〉 0.05 ). At 5 hour, prothrombin time and activated partial thrombin time were identified to be similar to those before SLED. During the treatments, no bleeding complication, thrombocytopenia, cardiac arrhythmia, hypernatremia, metabolic alkalosis or hypotension was observed. Conclusion SLED under regional citrate anticoagulation is safe and effective. Citrate achieves satisfying regional anticoagulation effect without interfering systemic clotting function, thus this study provides a new option of SLED anticoagulation for clinicians.
出处 《中华内科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期459-463,共5页 Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
关键词 柠檬酸 血液透析液 持续缓慢低效血液透析 抗凝 Citric acid Hemodialysis solutions Sustained low efficiency dialysis Anticoagulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Kidney. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Supplements ,2012,2 : 1-138.
  • 2付平,张凌.杂合肾脏替代治疗的临床应用[J].中国血液净化,2011,10(1):7-9. 被引量:22
  • 3Ronco C, Bellomo R, McCullough PA. Cardiorenal Syndromes in Crilical Care. Basel: Karger, 2010:251-262.
  • 4Tolwani A J, Wille KM. Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy. Semin Dial,2009,22 : 141-145.
  • 5Binici DN, Gunes N. Risk factors leading to reduced bone mineral density in hemodialysis patients with metabolic syndrome. Ren Fail, 2010,32:469-474.
  • 6Hirsh J, Warkentin TE, Shaughnessy SG, et al. Heparin and low- molecular-weight heparin : mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safely. Chest, 2001,119( I Suppl) :64S-94S.
  • 7van de Wetering J, Westendorp RG, van der ltoeven JG, et al. Heparin use in continuous renal replacement procedures: the struggle between filler coagulation and patient hemorrhage. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1996,7:145-150.
  • 8Davenport A, Will E J, Davison AM. Comparison of the use of standard heparin and prostacyclin anticoagulation in spontaneous and pump-driven extracorporeal circuits in patients with combined acute renal and hepatic failure. Nephron, 1994,66:431-437.
  • 9Marlin PY, Chevrolet JC, Suter P, et al. Anticoagulation in patients treated by continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a retrospective study. Am J Kidney Dis, 1994,24:806-812.
  • 10van der Voort PH, Gerritsen RT, Kuiper MA, et al. Filter run time in CVVH: preversus post-dilution and nadroparin versus regional heparin-protamine anticoagulation. Blood Purif, 2005, 23 : 175-180.

二级参考文献36

  • 1李洪,曾丽花,卢飞杏,吴洪兰,陈业珍,李德英,苏庆玲,赵英,黄烈诚.持续缓慢低效血液透析和连续静脉静脉血液滤过的对照研究[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2005,21(6):364-366. 被引量:26
  • 2Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Fiaccadori E, Baldwin I. Anticoagulation for renal replacement therapy : different methods to improve safety. Contrib Nephro, 2010,165:251-262.
  • 3Mariano F, Bergamo D, Gangemi EN, et al. Citrate anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: success and limits. Int J Nephrol, 2011, 2011:748320.
  • 4Hetzel GR, Taskaya G, Sucker C, et al. Citrate plasma levels in patients under regional anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Am J Kidney Dis, 2006, 48:806-811.
  • 5Tolwani A J, Wille KM. Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy. Semin Dial, 2009,22 : 141-145.
  • 6Hetzel GR, Schmitz M, Wissing H, et al. Regional citrate versus systemic heparin for anticoagulation in critically ill patients on continuous venovenous haemofihration: a prospective randomized multicentre trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2011,26 : 232-239.
  • 7Kutsogiannis DJ, Gibney RT, Stollery D, et al. Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement in critically ill patients. Kidney Int, 2005,67:2361- 2367.
  • 8Monchi M, Berghmans D, Ledoux D, et al. Citrate vs. heparin for anticoagulation in continuous venovenous hemofiltration: a prospective randomized study. Intensive Care Med, 2004,30:260- 265.
  • 9Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Bosman RJ, Koopmans M, et al. Citrate anticoagulation for continuous venovenous hemofihration. Crit Care Med, 2009,37:545-552.
  • 10Betjes MG, van Oosterom D, van Agteren M, et al. Regional citrate versus heparin anticoagulation during hemofihration in patients at low risk for bleeding: similar hemofilter survival but significantly less bleeding. J Nephrol, 2007,20 : 602-608.

共引文献43

同被引文献286

引证文献40

二级引证文献218

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部