摘要
目的 探讨宫颈糜烂的较佳治疗方法。方法 将 2 2 0例宫颈糜烂患者随机分为两组 :红外光组 112例 ,施行红外光治疗 ;激光组 10 8例 ,采用激光治疗。结果 红外光治疗宫颈糜烂一次治愈率为 92 .86% ( 10 4 112 ) ,CO2 激光一次治愈率为 72 .2 2 % ( 78 10 8)。两组治疗结果比较 ,差异有非常显著意义 (P <0 .0 1)。两组术中出血的发生率 :红外光组 2 .63 % ( 3 112 ) ,明显低于激光组 2 2 .2 2 % ( 2 4 10 8) ,差异有非常显著意义 (P <0 .0 1) ;术中腹痛及阴道内热刺痛 :红外光组 4.46% ( 5 112 ) ,明显低于激光组2 1.3 0 % ( 2 3 10 8) ,差异有非常显著意义 (P <0 .0 1)。结论 红外光治疗宫颈糜烂一次治愈率高 ,术中止血效果好 ,合并症低 ,是目前治疗宫颈糜烂的较佳方法。
Objective To search for a better way of treatment for cervical erosion.Methods 220 cases of cervical erosion were divided randomly into two groups:infrared light group which had 112 cases and used infrared light therapy;laser group which consisted of 108 cases and applied laser therapy.Results The once-cure rate of infrared light group was 92.86%(104/112),and that of the laser group was 72.22%(78/108).When the results were compared,there was a very significant difference between the two groups(P<0.001).The bleeding occurence rate of infrared light group was 2.63%(3/112),muth lower than that of laser group,which was 22.22%(24/108).There was also a very significant difference between them(P<0.001).As for abdominal pain and the piercing pain of vagina the occurence rate of infrared light group was 4.46%(5/112),and that of laser group was 21.30%(23/108).There was a very significant difference as well(P<0.001).Conclusions The infrared light therapy for cervical erosion can stop bleeding effectively.It has a very high once-cure rate,and the complication of this group was less.It is a better therapy for cervical erosion nowadays.
出处
《河北医药》
CAS
2000年第6期417-419,共3页
Hebei Medical Journal