期刊文献+

经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术治疗高龄高危前列腺增生症48例 被引量:3

Treatment of senior and high risk benign prostatic hyperplasia by transurethral plasmakinetic vaporization of prostate 48 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(TUPKP)治疗高龄高危良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的临床疗效。方法 2011年3月~2012年12月,我院应用TUPKP治疗高龄高危BPH患者48例,观察手术时间、术中出血量、手术并发症、术后住院天数,记录并计算手术前后的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、残余尿量改变等指标的差异。结果 48例患者均安全渡过围手术期,手术时间(45.0±25.6)min,切除腺体重(40.6±16.3)g,术中出血(100.0±62.5)mL。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)由术前(26.5±2.6)分降至术后(9.6±4.3)分,残余尿量由(223±25)mL降至(15.0±8.5)mL。随访3~24月,平均12个月,疗效满意。结论 TUPKP可作为高龄高危BPH患者安全有效的治疗方法,而非绝对禁忌证。 Objective To evaluate the effect of transurethral plasmakinetic vaporization of prostate (TUPKP) on senior and high risk benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods TUPKP was performed in 48 senior and high risk patients with BPH from March 2011 to December 2012,and operation time,blood loss,surgical complications,postoperative hospital stay,international prostate symptom score(IPSS)and residual urine volume were recorded and calculated. Results All of the 48 cases passed perioperative period safely. Average operation time was(45 ±25.6) rain,average weight of resected tissue was(40.6 ± 16.3)g,and blood loss was (100 ± 62.5) mL.IPSS were (26.5 ±.8)and( 9.6± 4.3),and the residual urine were (223 ±25) mL and (15 ± 8.5) mL.All the patients had been followed up for 3-24 months with an average of 12 months. The effect was satisfactory. Conclusion It is suggested that TUPKP is safe and effective to deal with the patients with BPH in senior and high risk.
作者 胡明 张湛英
出处 《中国医药科学》 2013年第10期215-216,共2页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 良性前列腺增生症 经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术 高龄高危 Benign prostatic hyperplasia Transurethral plasmakinetic vaporization of prostate Senior and high risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1吴伟江,邹伟波,梁晓宇,蔡志高,骆立虎.经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗良性前列腺增生[J].中国男科学杂志,2005,19(1):30-31. 被引量:17
  • 2吴伟江,王行环,王怀鹏,邹伟波,梁晓宇,蔡志高,钟巍巍,邹永锋,袁道彰.经尿道等离子体双极电切与经尿道普通电切对前列腺增生症的疗效比较[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(47):3365-3367. 被引量:104
  • 3任宝明,何士军,张争春,马龙,王录文.经尿道电切治疗高危前列腺增生症[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(1):52-53. 被引量:34
  • 4王伟明,朱英坚,沈海波,叶敏,陈建华,张良,孔良,齐隽.5%葡萄糖冲洗液用于前列腺汽化电切术的安全性探讨[J].中国男科学杂志,2007,21(6):48-50. 被引量:9
  • 5Botto H, Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of the prostate with the Gyms device. J Endourol, 2001, 15(3) : 313- 316.
  • 6Barba M, Leyh H, Hartung R. New technologies in transurethral resection of prostate. Curr Opin Urol, 2000, 10( 1 ) : 9-14.
  • 7Doll HA, Black NA, McPherson K, et al. Mortality, morbidity and complications following transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Urol, 1992, 147 (6) : 1566- 1573.
  • 8de Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, et al. Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate : A randomized prospective trial. Urology, 2006, 67 ( 1 ) : 69-72.
  • 9Wendt-Nordahl G, Hacker A, Fastenmeier K, et al. New bipolar resection device for transurethral resection of the prostate: First ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation. J Endourol, 2005, 19 (10): 1203 -1209.
  • 10Chinpairoj S, Feldman MD, Saunders JC, et al. A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new muhipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model. Laryngoscope, 2001, 111 (2) : 213-217.

共引文献159

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部