摘要
证明标准是承担证明责任的诉讼一方对待证事实进行证明所要达到的真实程度,它有客观层面和主观层面之分。与英美法中的"排除合理怀疑"和大陆法中的"内心确信无疑"不同,中国法确立了"事实清楚,证据确实、充分"的证明标准。我国刑事诉讼法近年来对这一证明标准作出了较为精细的解释,并将英美法中的"排除合理怀疑"引入到这一证明标准中来。对普通案件以及死刑案件中所要适用的证明标准作出适当的解读,是证据法学的一个重大理论课题。
Testification standard is the true degree that one litigation party who bears the burden to prove the facts Waiting for proving,it has the objective aspect and subjective aspect.Chinese law established the proof standard of 'fact fully proved,substantial evidence,sufficient',which is different from 'beyond a reasonable doubt' in Anglo-American law system and 'convincing to be the truth' in the continental law system.In recent years,the proof standard has made a more detailed explanation by Criminal procedure law in our country,and 'Eliminate a reasonable suspect' in Anglo-American law system has been introduced into the certificate standard.It is an important theoretical subject in evidence law that makes the appropriate interpretation to the proof standard which apply for normal cases and death penalty cases.
出处
《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第3期78-88,191,共11页
Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
关键词
证明标准
排除合理怀疑
内心确信无疑
事实清楚
证据确实、充分
testification standard
beyond a reasonable doubt
convincing to be the truth
fact fully proved
substantial evidence
sufficient