期刊文献+

Reflectivity/Impulsivity as an Important Individual Factor and Effectiveness of Awareness Raising Activities

Reflectivity/Impulsivity as an Important Individual Factor and Effectiveness of Awareness Raising Activities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper is a summary of the studies done on the importance of the cognitive styles especially reflectivity/impulsivity on the process of language acquisition. It discusses the importance of this cognitive style as an important factor on the effectiveness of awareness raising activities. In the previous studies, the importance of awareness raising has been found as an effective and facilitating factor in the process of the L2 (second language) acquisition, but the effect of different individual factors on its being usefulness has not been focused on; therefore, this study is an attempt to review and explore the importance of one of the individual factors, i.e., being reflective/impulsive cognitive style on the effectiveness of awareness raising activities. It is gathered that learners with different cognitive styles (being reflective/impulsive) react differently to the awareness giving activities, and the study tries to emphasize the importance of this factor on the usefulness of awareness raising and emphasizes the fact that in the field of awareness giving this factor should be attached impotence and accounted for as an effective factor.
出处 《Sino-US English Teaching》 2013年第4期281-286,共6页 中美英语教学(英文版)
关键词 IMPULSIVITY REFLECTIVITY awareness raising TLA (teachers' language awareness) 个人因素 反射率 人的因素 风格 语言
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Alderson, J. C., Clapham, C., & Steel, D. (1997). Metalinguistic knowledge, language aptitude and language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 1,93-121.
  • 2Al-Hejin, B. (2004). Attention and awareness: Evidence from cognitive and second language acquisition research. Working Papers in TESOL and Applied linguistics, 4( 1), 1-22.
  • 3Andrews, S. J. (1999a). Why do L2 teachers need to "Know About Language"? Teacher metalinguistic awareness and input for learning. Language and Education, 13(3), 161-177.
  • 4Andrews, S. 1. (2007). Teacher language awareness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Azizi, M. (1990). The impact of impulsivity/reflectivity on the EFL students' writing Ability (Unpublished master's thesis, University of Tehran, Iran).
  • 6Borg, S. (1994). Language awareness as a methodology: Implications for teachers and teacher training. Language Awareness, 3(2), 61-71.
  • 7Brodzinsky, D. M. (1985). On the relationship between cognitive styles and cognitive structures. In E. D. Neimark, R. Delisi, & J. L. Newman (Eds.), Moderators of competence (pp. 147-174). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
  • 8Brown, D. H. (2000). Principles of language learning and Teaching (4th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.
  • 9Carr, T. H., & Curran, T. (1994). Cognitive factors in learning about structured sequences: Application to syntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 205-230.
  • 10Dewaele, J.-M. (2005). Investigating the psychological and emotional dimensions in instructed language learning: Obstacles and possibilities. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3),367-380.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部