盗窃罪既遂与未遂的司法认定

Judicial Determination of Accomplished and Attempted Theft

判断盗窃罪的既遂与未遂的标准理论界素有争议,而司法实践中对具体盗窃案件既遂与未遂的认定标准也各不相同。文章通过对接触说、隐匿说、移动说、失控说等判断盗窃既遂、未遂的理论学说的分析,认为控制说能够帮助恰当的区分盗窃罪的既遂与未遂,并从被盗窃对象的物理性征及功能角度亦进行了深层次研究。

There has been a dispute on the standard of the judgment of accomplished and attempted theft in the theoretical world,and in judicial practice,there are also various standards.Through analyzing the theories of judging accomplished and attempted theft such as contact theory,concealment theory,moving theory,and out-of-control theory,this article points out that controlling theory is helpful to make a proper distinction of accomplished and attempted theft,and makes a deep research on the physical features and function of the theft object.