期刊文献+

罗氏电化学发光检测系统乙型肝炎表面抗原定量检测方法学评价及性能验证 被引量:10

Evaluate of the method for HBsAg detection with Roche electrochemiluminescence system
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的按美国病理学家协会CAP和ISO15189实验室认可的要求,对罗氏Elecsys MODULAR AN-ALYTICS E-170电化学发光系统乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)定量检测进行方法学评价和性能验证。方法取患者高、低值混合血清,分别进行批内20次和连续20d检测,计算批内不精密度和批间不精密度;将高、低值血清按一定比例混合后进行检测,验证分析测量范围(AMR);取浓度接近1∶400稀释检测低限值的血清标本,连续检测12d,进行可报告低限值(LoQ)验证;取原倍及自动稀释后均可检测的标本,进行原倍及自动稀释检测,计算其符合程度,进行自动稀释正确度验证。结果高、低值批内不精密度(以变异系数表示)分别为2.23%和1.99%,批间不精密度分别为4.03%和3.16%,LoQ为24.905IU/mL,AMR为22.075~48 158.25IU/mL;自动稀释与原倍检测结果偏差小于20%。结论该系统检测性能符合实验室质量要求。 Objective To evaluate the method for hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg) detection with Roche electrochemiluminescence system.Methods The within-run and between-day imprecision was evaluated with high and low level mixed serum.The analytic mesurea range(AMR) was evaluated with serially diluted serums.Limit of quanlity(LoQ) was evaluated with continous detection of low level serums.Accuracy of auto-dilution was evaluated with primary serum sample and diluted samples.Results The imprecision for high and low value were 2.23% and 1.99% for within-run and were 4.03% and 3.16% for between-day.The LoQ was 24.905 IU/mL and the AMR was 22.075-48 158.25 IU/mL.The bias between primary and diluted samples was less than 20%.Conclusion The system measurement characteristic fit the requirement of clinical laboratory.
出处 《检验医学与临床》 CAS 2013年第11期1407-1408,共2页 Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
关键词 乙型肝炎表面抗原 定量检测 方法学评价 性能验证 HBsAg quantitation measurement method evaluation performance verification
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Chan HLY,Wong VWS,Tse AML,et al. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen quantitation can refluent hepatitis B vi rus in the liver and predict treatment response[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2007,5(10) : 1462-1468.
  • 2College of American Pathologists. Clinical immunology checklist[M]. Washington, USA : CAP, 2006.
  • 3National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standard. EP5- A Evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemis- try devices[S]. Wayne, PA, USA : NCCLS, 1999.
  • 4National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standard. EP6- P2 Evaluation of tinearity of quantitative analytical meth- ods. Proposed guideline-second edition[S]. Wayne, PA, USA: NCCLS, 1996.
  • 5National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standard. EP9- A Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples[ S]. Wayne, PA, USA :NCCLS, 1995.
  • 6National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standard. EP10-A Preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory methods[S]. Wayne, PA, USA : NCCLS, 1998.

同被引文献53

引证文献10

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部