摘要
故意与过失的区分之间应有一个衔接的问题,而这个衔接点应体现在间接故意和有认识的过失之间,即有认识的过失与间接故意在法益侵害程度上相互衔接。正是这种衔接,造成了间接故意和有认识的过失在理论与实践中的区别之难。基于这种相互衔接,过失犯罪的法定刑之最高刑,就应和侵犯同类法益的故意犯罪之最低刑之间保持一致,以解决司法实践中的区别不能之谜。
A transitional state of mind should exist between intentional and negligent offence. The con- tion between indirect intentional and knowingly negligent offence in theory and practice. Considering this inter- connection, the maximum statutory sentencing of negligent offence should be consistent with the minimum stat- utory sentencing of intentional offence against the same type of legal interests, thus the predicament of distinc- tion in judicial practice can be resolved accordingly.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
2013年第3期36-45,共10页
Northern Legal Science
基金
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目"江苏食品安全监管机制创新及实现路径研究"(PAPD)资助
2012年度高校哲学社会科学基金项目(项目编号2012SJB820011)的资助
关键词
罪过
过失犯罪
法定刑
guilt negligent offence statutory sentence