摘要
从法律文本和立宪意图分析,全国人大只能制定和修改"基本法律"、"基本法律以外的其他法律"由全国人大常委会制定和修改。弥补全国人大立法不足是现行《宪法》赋予全国人大常委会国家立法权的首要目标,而防范全国人大常委会侵夺全国人大立法权则是其附带的要求,这二者之间并非平行的目标关系;"基本法律"和"基本法律以外的其他法律"的划分,正是这种附带要求的产物。实践中,全国人大与全国人大常委会立法权限的错位以及两种不同的"法律"在效力上的混同,根源于人民代表大会制度下人大与其常委会之间权力关系在制度层面与实践层面存在的张力。
According to legal texts and constitutional intent, the NPC can only enact and amend "Basic Statutes", and "Other Statutes" are enacted and amended by the Standing Committee of the NPC. The prima- ry purpose of the Constitution to entrust legislative power to the NPC Standing Committee is to overcome the in- sufficiency of legislation by the NPC, while preventing the Standing Committee from infringing upon the legis- lative powers of the NPC is the collateral purpose. Therefore, the division between Basic Statutes and Other Statutes was the product of these two purposes, which are not parallel. In practice, the dislocation of legisla- tive powers between the NPC and the Standing Committee and thus causing the confusion of legal effects from these two different "laws" are deeply rooted in the tension of the power between the NPC and the Standing Committee of the NPC both at institutional level and practical level.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
2013年第3期133-145,共13页
Northern Legal Science
关键词
基本法律
其他法律
立法权限
法律效力
Basic Statutes Other Statutes legislative power legal effects