期刊文献+

“基本法律”与“基本法律以外的其他法律”划分之反思 被引量:13

Reflects on the Division between "Basic Statutes" and "Other Statutes"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从法律文本和立宪意图分析,全国人大只能制定和修改"基本法律"、"基本法律以外的其他法律"由全国人大常委会制定和修改。弥补全国人大立法不足是现行《宪法》赋予全国人大常委会国家立法权的首要目标,而防范全国人大常委会侵夺全国人大立法权则是其附带的要求,这二者之间并非平行的目标关系;"基本法律"和"基本法律以外的其他法律"的划分,正是这种附带要求的产物。实践中,全国人大与全国人大常委会立法权限的错位以及两种不同的"法律"在效力上的混同,根源于人民代表大会制度下人大与其常委会之间权力关系在制度层面与实践层面存在的张力。 According to legal texts and constitutional intent, the NPC can only enact and amend "Basic Statutes", and "Other Statutes" are enacted and amended by the Standing Committee of the NPC. The prima- ry purpose of the Constitution to entrust legislative power to the NPC Standing Committee is to overcome the in- sufficiency of legislation by the NPC, while preventing the Standing Committee from infringing upon the legis- lative powers of the NPC is the collateral purpose. Therefore, the division between Basic Statutes and Other Statutes was the product of these two purposes, which are not parallel. In practice, the dislocation of legisla- tive powers between the NPC and the Standing Committee and thus causing the confusion of legal effects from these two different "laws" are deeply rooted in the tension of the power between the NPC and the Standing Committee of the NPC both at institutional level and practical level.
作者 沈寿文
机构地区 云南大学法学院
出处 《北方法学》 CSSCI 2013年第3期133-145,共13页 Northern Legal Science
关键词 基本法律 其他法律 立法权限 法律效力 Basic Statutes Other Statutes legislative power legal effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

共引文献205

同被引文献97

引证文献13

二级引证文献115

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部