期刊文献+

中国法上董事会的角色、职能及思想渊源:实证法的考察 被引量:69

Role,Function and Root of Thought of the Board of Directors under the Chinese Legal Framework: Based on Empirical Research
原文传递
导出
摘要 董事会处于公司治理的核心地位,在公司从公到私的不同历史进化阶段,以及不同的立法例中,分别存在着立法者、司法者、监督者、战略管理、关系投资者战略联盟以及制约霸权等不同的定位和职能。而中国现行公司法中的董事会角色和定位,受制于股东本位的倾向,在法律规范的表述中呈现出定位不明,角色不清,并且其职能相比之下被股东会和经理侵蚀。但是在对董事责任的追究上却与之相矛盾,同时,在具体运作上也呈现出与应有的合议方式不相符的行为模式。中国版的董事会的权力配置、角色定位,是对现有宪政制度的简单模仿,虽然符合一国公司治理受制于政治传统的原理,但缺乏依据商业现实的需要而不断进化的回应动力。 Board of Directors plays an essential part in company governance, and there have been different orientations and functions of being legislator, judiciary, strategy management, strategic alliance of relation in- vestors, hegemony restriction, and etc. in the different cases of legislation and over different historical evolu- tion phases of the company changing from public to private ownership. The directors under the existing Chinese company law, restricted to the tendency role and orientation of the board of of stakeholder standard, however, take on unclear orientation and obscure role in the statement of law and regulations. Moreover, its functions are comparatively eroded by stakeholder conference and managers. To the contrary, it is conflicted with the in- vestigation for liability of directors, and in terms of operation, there is a behavior pattern not conforming to the proper collegiate system. Power allocation and role orientation of the board of directors in China simply imitate the existing constitutionalism system. In spite of the fact that the principle of company government in a country subject to political tradition is followed, a increasingly evolutionary correspondent driving force according to practical demand of commence lacks.
作者 邓峰
出处 《中国法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期98-108,共11页 China Legal Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献50

  • 1See Franklin A. Gevurtz, The Historical and Political Origins of the Corporate Board of Directors, Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 33, 2004, p. 108. Hereinafter cited as "C, evurtz Historical Origins".
  • 2邓峰.中国公司治理的路径依赖[J].中外法学,2008,20(1):58-65. 被引量:44
  • 3See Henry Hansmann and Reinier Kraakman, End of History in Corporate Law, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 89,2001, pp. 439-468.
  • 4See also Henry Hansmann, How Close is the End of History, Journal of Corporation Law, Vol. 31,2006, pp. 745-751.
  • 5See Lucian Arye Bebchuk and Mark J. Roe, A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance, Stanford Law Review, VoL 52, 1999, pp. 127 - 170.
  • 6See Klaus Heine and Wolfgang Kerber, European Corporate Laws, Regulatory Competition and Path Depend- ence, European Journal of Law and Economics, VoL 13, 2002, pp. 47 -71.
  • 7邓峰.董事会制度的起源、演进与中国的学习[J].中国社会科学,2011(1):164-176. 被引量:83
  • 8史际春,邓峰.论经济责任制对国企改革价值的再发现[J].政法论坛,1999,17(1):12-19. 被引量:12
  • 9苏力.《法制及其本土资源》.中国政法大学出版社,1996年版,第190页.
  • 10吴志攀.《序一中国式“公司治理”》,载甘培忠,楼建波主编.《公司治理专论》,北京大学出版社2009年版,第l一3页.

二级参考文献370

共引文献591

同被引文献1222

引证文献69

二级引证文献614

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部