期刊文献+

基于达标保证率的昆明市污水处理厂出水水质评价 被引量:16

Assessment of effluent quality of wastewater treatment plant in Kunming based on the percentile of standard compliance method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用多元统计分析,将水质分级评价法和达标保证率法相结合,评价了昆明市7座污水处理厂出水水质.以《城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准》(GB18918-2002)一级A限值为达标基准,7座污水处理厂出水COD达标保证率均为100%、出水BOD5和SS达标保证率分别在94%和95%以上,不同污水处理厂出水TP、NH3-N和TN的达标保证率表现出较大差异,多维标度分析表明,出水TP的达标保证率与其他指标的偏离程度最大.将污染指标的达标保证率进行分级,建立污水处理厂污染指标达标满意程度评价规则,并制定出水水质的达标控制指标清单.结果表明,TP是第二和第七污水处理厂的重点控制指标,是第三污水处理厂的Ⅰ级控制指标;TN是第三和第七污水处理厂的Ⅰ级控制指标;NH3-N是第一和第三污水处理厂的Ⅰ级控制指标. The effluent quality of seven wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in Kunming was assessed by using multivariate statistical analysis, combining classification evaluation and percentile of standard compliance. According to Level I-A of "Discharge standard of pollutants for municipal wastewater treatment plant" (GB18918-2002), the compliance percentiles of COD in the effluent of the 7 WWTPs were all 100%, BODs and SS were above 94% and 95%, respectively. The percentiles of standard compliance of TN, TP and NH3-N presented much difference. The deviation of TP was highest among all the indicators by the multidimensional scaling analysis. The inventory of the control indicator for standard compliance of the effluent of Kunming WWTPs was established, with classifying the percentile of standard compliance of the effluent and formulating the rules for water quality assessment of the effluent of WWTPs. The results showed that TP was the key control parameter of the 2rid WWTP and the 7th WWTP, and was the first priority control parameter of the 3rd WWTP. Meanwhile, TN was the first priority control parameter of the 3rd WWTP and 7th WWTP, and NH3-N is the first priority control parameter of the 1 st WWTP and 3rd WWTP in Kunming.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期1113-1119,共7页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX0730-2002)
关键词 污水处理厂 出水水质 达标保证率 水质评价 wastewater treatment plant effluent water quality percentile of standard compliance water quality assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Benedetti L, Dirckx G, Bixio D, et al. Environmental and economic performance assessment of the integrated urbanwastewater system [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2008,88(4): 1262-1272.
  • 2Colmenarejoa M F, Rubioa A, Sfincheza E, et al. Evaluation of municipal wastewater treatment plants with different technologies at Las Rozas, Madrid (Spain) [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2006,81(4):399-404.
  • 3Weirich S R, Silverstein J, Rajagopalan B. Effect of average flow and capacity utilization on effluent water quality from US municipal wastewater treatment facilities [J]. Water Research, 2011,45(14):4279-86.
  • 4郭劲松,王红,龙腾锐.水资源水质评价方法分析与进展[J].重庆环境科学,1999,21(6):1-3. 被引量:84
  • 5申献辰,邹晓雯,杜霞.中国地表水资源质量评价方法的研究[J].水利学报,2002,33(12):63-67. 被引量:29
  • 6周丰,郭怀成,刘永,罗定贵,王真.基于多元统计分析和RBFNNs的水质评价方法[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(5):846-853. 被引量:66
  • 7Kowalkowski T, Zbytniewski R, Szpejna J, et al. Application of chemometrics in river water classification [J]. Water Research, 2006,40(4):744-752.
  • 8Zhou F, Liu Y, Guo H C. Application of multivariate statistical methods to water quality assessment of the watercourses in northwestern new territories, Hong Kong [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2007,132( 1-3): 1-13.
  • 9邵磊,周孝德,杨方廷,韩军.基于自由搜索的投影寻踪水质综合评价方法[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(12):1708-1714. 被引量:32
  • 10孙兆兵,王保良,冀海峰,黄志尧,李海青.基于概率组合的水质预测方法[J].中国环境科学,2011,31(10):1657-1662. 被引量:23

二级参考文献62

共引文献231

同被引文献219

引证文献16

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部