摘要
目的探讨和比较经桡动脉途径和股动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗的疗效。方法选择2009年10月至2012年10月在我院住院的100例冠心病患者,根据穿刺入路把患者分为桡动脉组和股动脉组,每组各50例,评价两组患者的穿刺时间、住院时间以及术后并发症等。结果与股动脉组相比,桡动脉组的穿刺时间、住院卧床时间明显缩短,P<0.05。且桡动脉组术后出现并发症的发生率明显降低,P<0.05,两组冠状动脉介入诊疗时间无明显差别。结论相对于股动脉入路,经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗的术后并发症相对较少,并且住院时间较短,从而增加了患者的耐受性和依从性。
Objective To explore and discuss the therapeutic effects of trans-radial and trans-femoral coronary interven tion.Methods One hundred patients with coronary heart disease from October 2009 to October 2012 admitted to our hospital were di vided into trans-radial group and trans-femoral group according to puncture way,with 50 cases in each group.The puncture time,hospitalization time,postoperative complications and other aspects of the two groups were observed and compared.Results Compared with trans-femoral group,the puncture time and therapeutic operation time and hospitalization time of trans-radial group were significantly sHorter（P＆lt; 0.05）.Compared with trans-femoral group,the incidence of postoperative complications of trans-radial group was significantly decreased（P＆lt; 0.05）.There was no statistically significant difference of consultation time of coronary intervention between the twogroups.Conclusion Relative to the way of trans-femoral,the treatment of trans-radial coronary intervention has less postoperative complications,sorter hospitalization time,which adds comfort of patients and easier to be accepted by the patients and families.
出处
《中国实用医药》
2013年第14期17-19,共3页
China Practical Medicine
