期刊文献+

中美商业银行竞争力比较研究——基于改进后的CAMEL框架 被引量:4

An Comparative Study On The Competitiveness between China Banks and American Banks——Based On Revised CAMEL Framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在CAMEL框架基础上引入创新能力因子,并运用超效率DEA方法量化商业银行管理质量,通过因子分析得出各类别得分,然后分配权重求得中美商业银行竞争力排名,并进行差距分析。结果显示,中国商业银行2011年在流动性、盈利能力上优于美国商业银行,管理水平上趋同于美国商业银行,在资本充足性、资产质量上稍劣于美国商业银行,但在创新能力上与美国商业银行有较大差距。我国商业银行应大力发展中间业务,达到品牌化、规模化,同时实施客户价值链管理以及全面风险管理战略,切实提高我国商业银行的持续国际竞争力。 An innovative ability factor is introduced hased on the CAMEL framework,and commercial bank' s management quality is quantified by super - efficiency DEA method, each category score is acquired by factor analysis, and after a weight assigned, the commercial banks' competitive- ness between China and America is calculated and the gap is analyzed meantime. Results show that,in 2011 ,Chinese commercial banks are better than the U. S. commercial bank in both liquidity and pmfitability;Chinese banks are on convergence with U. S. banks in management level;while Chinese banks' capital adequacy and asset quality, are slightly worse than U. S. banks;but there is a large gap in innovation ability between Chinese banks and U. S. ' s ones. China~ commercial banks should vigorously develop the intermediary business by scale management and brand develop- ment, and carry out the customer value chain management and comprehensive risk management strategy, to effectively improve the sustained interna- tional competitiveness of China' s commercial banks.
出处 《哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2013年第3期12-20,共9页 Journal of Harbin University of Commerce:Social Science Edition
关键词 CAMEL模型 超效率DEA法 因子分析 商业银行 竞争力 CAMEL model super -effiency DEA method factor analysis commercial banks competitiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献28

共引文献35

同被引文献26

  • 1张峰.补偿与可持续发展的经济学分析[J].海派经济学,2010,8(1):105-113. 被引量:1
  • 2刘锡良,刘轶.提升我国商业银行竞争力:成本领先战略视角[J].金融研究,2006(4):71-81. 被引量:30
  • 3Adams,J.S.Inequity in Social Exchange.In L.Berkowitz(Ed),Advances in experimental social psychology,New York:Academic Press,1965:267-299.
  • 4Thibaut,J.Walker,L.Procedural justice:A psychological analysis.Hillsdale[M].NJ:Erlbaum,1975.
  • 5Bies R J,Moag J F.Interactional justice:Communication criteria of fairness.In:Lewicki R J,Sheppard B H,Bazerman M H ed.Research on negotiations in organizations(Vol.1).Greenwich,CT:JAI Press,1986.43-55.
  • 6Colquitt,J.A.,Conlon,D.E,Wesson,M.J.,Porter,C.O.Ng,K.Y.Justice at the Millennium:A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research.Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86(3):425-445.
  • 7Prahalad,C.K.and Hamel,G.the core competence of the corporation[J].Harvard Business review,1990,66(9):79-91.
  • 8Colquitt,J.A.On the dimensionality of organizational justice:A construct validation of a measure[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2001,86:386-400.
  • 9Leventhal,G.S.What should be done with equity theory?New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships.In:K.Gergen,M.Greenberg&R.Willis(Eds.).Social Exchange:Advances in Theory and Research.New York:Plenum,1980.
  • 10庄起善,窦菲菲.转型经济国家银行竞争力的比较研究[J].世界经济研究,2008(3):25-32. 被引量:4

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部