期刊文献+

子宫肌瘤切除术与子宫动脉栓塞治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效比较 被引量:3

Efficacy Comparison of Myomectomy and Uterine Artery Embolization for Uterine Fibroids
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨子宫肌瘤采用子宫肌瘤切除术与子宫动脉栓塞治疗的临床效果对比。方法本次研究选择的对象共90例,随机按观察组50例及对照组40例划分,对照组采用子宫肌瘤切除术治疗,观察组采用子宫动脉栓塞治疗,回顾相关临床资料。结果观察组50例患者中,显效40例;有效8例;无效2例;总有效率为96%。对照组40例中,显效21例;有效13例;无效6例;总有效率为85%。观察组临床总有效率显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论子子宫动脉栓塞术使临床有效率显著提高,显著改善了患者生存质量。 Objective To investigate the clinical effects of uterine fibroids, myomectomy and uterine artery embolization contrast. Method The object of study selected a total of 90 cases, were randomLy divided into observation group (50 cases) and control group 40 cases, the control group, uterine artery embolization, myomectomy treatment, observation group with a review of relevant clinical information. Results 50 patients of the observation group, 40 cases; effective in 8 cases; ineffective in 2 cases; overall response rate was 96%, The control group, 40 cases were cured, 2l cases; effective 13 cases; 6 cases; overall response rate was 85%. Clinical total effective rate of observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion The clinical sub uterine artery embolization the efficiency significantly improve, significantly improved the quality of life of patients.
作者 刘远芳 张红
出处 《中国医药指南》 2013年第12期39-40,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 子宫肌瘤 子宫肌瘤切除术 疗效比较 Uterine fibroids Myomectomy Efficacy comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献67

共引文献184

同被引文献39

  • 1陈春林,刘萍,曾北蓝,马奔,张浩.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫腺肌病的中远期临床疗效观察[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(10):660-663. 被引量:56
  • 2李广太,温廷如.子宫动脉栓塞术治疗子宫肌瘤有效性和安全性的荟萃分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(10):697-700. 被引量:14
  • 3冯碧波,王西萍,翟建军,梁熙虹.子宫动脉栓塞和子宫切除术对卵巢功能的影响[J].中国生育健康杂志,2007,18(6):340-343. 被引量:2
  • 4Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraruvigneron N, et al. Arterial embolization to treat uterine myomata[J]. Lancet, 1 995, 346(8976):671-672.
  • 5Chrisman HB, Saker MB, Ryu RK, et al. The impact of uterine fibroid embolization on resumption of menses and ovarian function[J].J Vasc Interv Radio/, 2000, 11 (6):699-703.
  • 6Ahmad A, Qadan L, Hassan N, et al. Uterine artery embolization treatment of uterine fibroids: Effect on ovarian function in younger women[J]. J Vasc Interv Radio/, 2002, 13(10):1017-1020.
  • 7朱志芳.子宫动脉栓塞与子宫肌瘤剔除术治疗子宫肌瘤临床疗效对比分析[J].中外健康文摘,2013,5(15):56-57.
  • 8Edwards RD, Moss JG, Lumsden MA, et al. Uterine-artery embolization versus Surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids[J]. NEJM, 2007, 356(4):360-370.
  • 9Hehenkamp WJ, Volkers NA, Donderwinkel PF, et al. Uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids (EMMY trial): peri- and postprocedural results from a randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 193(5):1618-1629.
  • 10Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, et al. Uterine Artery Embolization versus Myomectomy: Impact on quality of life-results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial[J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radio/, 2012, 35(3): 530-536.

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部