《乐庵语录》辨证

Textual Research on Quotations from Le An

《四库全书总目》从授受情况、全书大旨、序跋、朱熹不辨其混儒墨禅等考究,疑宋龚昱所编李衡之《乐庵语录》为伪。今考《乐庵语录》乃明郑文康得之何文渊者,与当时昆山地方人士长期关注李衡事迹学问相符;其书虽龚昱编,实乃宋左史祕所撰,并由其后裔左溍补缉,刊于明代;而宋王应麟、赵善璙皆尝引录其部分文字,故其书授受可靠,传承可信。李衡本好老庄、佛禅,其学术大旨与明姚江之学确有相近之处,其书序跋乃因人而作,适可相证,以之为影撰,颠倒宋明时序,不可信从。李衡学术渊源出于程氏,以理学名,并未因禅而毁儒,又与朱熹有过从,故朱熹不辩其说,合情合理。总之,《乐庵语录》乃真书,并非明儒伪作。

Quotations from Le An is considered as a counterfeit by The SI KU QUAN SHU ZONG MU. However, its reasons are tenable. Firstly, this book＇s text transfer was clear. Secondly, the author Li Heng＇s academic thoughts were indeed affected by Buddhism and were similar to the Ming Dynasty yao Jiang＇s thoughts. Thirdly, Li Heng learned from Cheng Yi, and was in close association with Zhu Xi. Actually, Quotations from Le An is not a counter- feit.