期刊文献+

图像引导无固定颈部放疗计划危及体积边界初探 被引量:2

Primary Study of the Threatening of Unfixed Planning of Image Guided Radiotherapy to the Volume Margin of Neck Tumor
原文传递
导出
摘要 对不能耐受面罩固定的颈部肿瘤患者,采用单纯头垫支撑、CT模拟定位时,激光标记点用皮肤墨水画于颈部皮肤,脊髓-计划危及体积边界设为5mm,行锥形束CT引导下的调强放射治疗。每日放射治疗时行三次锥形束CT(CBCT)扫描,与定位CT参考图像匹配,计算患者平均值的平均值(M(μi))和标准差((μi))、患者标准差的均方根(RMS(σi))和标准差((σi))。以第三次的匹配结果重新计算评估脊髓-计划危及体积边界。结果显示,该方法可以明显减少分次间误差,使分次内误差保持较低水平。配合5mm的脊髓-计划危及体积边界,对部分不能耐受面罩固定的肿瘤患者,可以进行安全有效的高剂量放疗。 Some patients who have neck tumor but cannot tolerate the thermoplastic immobilization may be supported by simple cushions, and are marked on the neck skin during CT simulation. We therefore set 5 mm as the spinal cord-planning risk volume margin in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans in our Centre. Cone beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for three times, and matched with the simulation CT images in each radiotherapy. The mean and the standard deviation of the individual, the root mean-square and the standard deviation of the individual were calculated. The matched results of the third CBCT were used to calculate the spinal cord- planning risk volume margin. The results showed that the interfraction error was significantly reduced and the intrafraction error was stable by CBCT guiding. CBCT and 5 mm spinal cord-planning organ is feasible and safe without threatening volume margin to high dose radiotherapy for the patients with neck tumor and not able to tolerate thermoplastic immobilization.
出处 《生物医学工程学杂志》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期503-507,共5页 Journal of Biomedical Engineering
关键词 锥形束CT 颈部放疗 脊髓一计划危及体积边界 Cone-beam CT (CBCT) Radiotherapy for neck tumor The spinal cord-planning organ threatening volume margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1GORDON J J, SIEBERS J V. Convolution method and CTV-to-PTV margins finite fractions and small systematic errors[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2007,52(7): 1967-1990.
  • 2MONGIOJ V,ORLANDI E,PALAZZI M, et al. Set-up er-rors analyses in IMRT treatments for nasopharyngeal carcino-ma to evaluate time trends? PTV and PRV margins [J]. Acta0ncol,2011,50(1) :61-71.
  • 3ZHANG X Y,HAN J H,ZHU W G, et al. The study ofCTV-PTV margin during the treatment of nasopharyngealcarcinoma with intensity modulation radiation therapy [J]. JBasic Clin Oncol, 2010,23(4); 312-314.
  • 4WILKINSON J M, Geometric uncertainties in radiotherapy[J]. Br J Radiol, 2004, 77(914): 86-87.
  • 5GUTFELD O’ KRETZLER A E,KASHANI R’ et al. Influ-ence of rotations on dose distributions in spinal stereotacticbody radiotherapy(SBRT)[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2009, 73(5): 1596-1601.
  • 6VAN HERK M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy [J]. Se-min Radiat Oncol, 2004,14(1): 52-64.
  • 7BALLIVY O,PARKER W, VUONG T, et al. Impact of ge-ometric uncertainties on dose distribution during intensitymodulated radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer: the need fora planning target volume and a planning organ-at-risk volume[J]. Curr Oncol, 2006, 13(3): 108-115.
  • 8DELANA A, MENEGOTTI L, BOLNER A, et al. Impact ofresidual setup error on parotid gland dose in intensity-modulatedradiation therapy with or without planning organ-at-risk margin[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2009,185(7) : 453-459.
  • 9SUZUKI M, NISHIMURA Y, NAKAMATSU K, et al. A-nalysis of interfractional set-up errors and intrafractional or-gan motions during IMRT for head and neck tumors to definean appropriate planning target volume (PTV)- and planningorgans at risk volume (PRV)-margins [J]. Radiother Oncol,2006, 78(3): 283-290.
  • 10MCKENZIE A,VAN HERK M, MIJNHEER B. Marginsfor geometric uncertainty around organs at risk in radiothera-py [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2002,62(3): 299-307.

二级参考文献18

  • 1Wang J, Bai S, Chen NY,et al. Preminary study on the clinical feasibility and effect of online cone beam computer tomography guided intensityrr/odulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Radiother Oncoh 2009,90(2) : 221- 227.
  • 2Xu F, Wang J, Bai S, et al. Detection of intrafractionl tumor position error in radiotherapy utilizing cone beam computed tomography[J ]. Radiot her Oncol, 2008,89 (3):311-319.
  • 3Den RB,Doemer A, Kubicek G,etal. Daily image guidance with cone-beam computed tomography for head-and neck cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a prospective study[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2010,76(5): 1353- 1359.
  • 4van Kranen S, van Beek S, Rasch C, et al. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2009, 73(5):1566-1573.
  • 5Zhang L,Garden AS, Lo J, el al. Multiple regions-of-interest analysis of setupuncertainties for head and-neck cancer radiotherapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 64 (5) :1559-1569.
  • 6Polat B,Wilbert J, Baier K, et al. Nonrigid patient setup errors in the head-and-neck region[J].Strahlenther Onkol, 2007,183 (9):506 -511.
  • 7van Beek S, van Kranen S, Mencarelli A, et al. First clinical experience with a multiple region of interest registration and correction method in radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer patients[J].Radiother Oncol, 2010,94: 213-217.
  • 8van Kranen S, van Beek S, Menearelli A, et al. Correction strategies to manage deformations in head-and-neck radiotherapy[J].Radiother Oncol, 2010,94(2) : 199-205.
  • 9van Herk M, Kooy HM. Automatic three dimensional correlation of CT-CT, CT-MRI, and CT-SPECT using chamfer matching [J]. Med Phys, 1994,21(7):1163-1178.
  • 10Meyer J, Wilbert J, Baier K, et al. Positioning accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in combination with a HexaPOD robot treatment table[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2007,67 (4):1220-1228.

共引文献6

同被引文献34

  • 1崔明明,闫镔,曹鸿涛,陈健,曾磊.基于全局二值特征描述子的三维CBCT图像快速匹配算法[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报,2015,27(4):666-673. 被引量:3
  • 2陆军,刘晓莉,赵海涛,傅莉,范风云,魏丽春,石梅.仰卧与俯卧设计放疗方案在食管癌治疗中选择研究[J].生物医学工程与临床,2006,10(1):18-21. 被引量:1
  • 3Dzierma Y,Beyhs M,Palm J,et al.Set-up errors and planning margins in planar and CBCT image-guided radiotherapy using three different imaging systems:A clinical study for prostate and headand-neck cancer[J].Phys Med,2015,31(8):1055-1059.
  • 4Zhang Y,Wu H,Chen Z,et al.Concomitant imaging dose and cancer risk in image guided thoracic radiation therapy[J].Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2015,93(3):523-531.
  • 5Ciardo D,Alterio D,Jereczek-Fossa BA,et al.Set-up errors in head and neck cancer patients treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy:Quantitative comparison between three-dimensional cone-beam CT and two-dimensional kilovoltage images[J].Phys Med,2015,31(8):1015-1021.
  • 6Xin S.Setup errors in cone-beam computed tomography and their effects on acute radiation toxicity in cervical cancerradiotherapy[J].Genet Mol Res,2015,14(3):10937-10943.
  • 7Heijkoop ST,Langerak TR,Quint S,et al.Quantification of intrafraction changes during radiotherapy of cervical cancer assessed with pre-and post-fraction Cone Beam CT scans[J].Radiother Oncol,2015,117(3):536-541.
  • 8Huang Y,Gardner SJ,Wen N,et al.Radiobiologically optimized couch shift:A new localization paradigm using cone-beam CT for prostate radiotherapy[J].Med Phys,2015,42(10):6028-6032.
  • 9Wood TJ,Moore CS,Horsfield CJ,et al.Accounting for patient size in the optimization of dose and image quality of pelvis cone beam CT protocols on the Varian OBI system[J].Br J Radiol,2015,88(1055):20150364.
  • 10Dolezel M,Slezak P,Odrazka K,et al.Interfraction variation in prostate cancer-analysis of 11726cone-beam CT[J].J BUON,2015,20(4):1081-1087.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部