期刊文献+

The Differential Effects of Exercise, Brace and Combined Rehabilitation Treatment in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

The Differential Effects of Exercise, Brace and Combined Rehabilitation Treatment in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective:To compare the effects of different conservative managements on patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Method:One hundred and four AIS patients were recruited for this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups:exercise (E group), brace (B group) and combined rehabilitation treatment (brace treatment combined with exercise, CR group). Radiological parameter were used to assess AIS patients before and after treatment. The Chinese version of scoliosis research society-22(SRS-22) patient questionnaires were filled out by patients after treatment. The SRS-22 scores were compared among management groups. Result:The maximal Cobb angles were smaller in E group than in B group or CR group both before and af- ter treatment. The maximal Cobb angles were significantly smaller after treatment than before treatment in B group and CR group. Function/activity was better in E group than in B group or CR group. Self-image/appear- ance and satisfaction with management were better in E group and CR group than in B group. There was no significant difference among treatment groups in pain and mental health. Conclusion:Both brace and combined rehabilitation treatment can reduce the spinal curve of AIS patients. Both exercise and combined rehabilitation treatment have positive influence on self-image/appearance and satis- faction with management. We support preference of combined rehabilitation treatment above brace treatment. Objective: To compare the effects of different conservative managements on patients with adolescent ldlopatlalC scoliosis (AIS). Method: One hundred and four A1S patients were recruited for this study. The patients were divided into 3 groups: exercise (E group), brace (B group) and combined rehabilitation treatment (brace treatment combined with exercise, CR group). Radiological parameter were used to assess AIS patients before and after treatment. The Chinese version of scoliosis research soeiety-22(SRS-22) patient questionnaires were filled out by patients after treatment. The SRS-22 scores were compared among management groups. Result: The maximal Cobb angles were smaller in E group than in B group or CR group both before and af- ter treatment. The maximal Cobb angles were significantly smaller after treatment than before treatment in B group and CR group. Function/activity was better in E group than in B group or CR group. Self-image/appear- ance and satisfaction with management were better in E group and CR group than in B group. There was no significant difference among treatment groups in pain and mental health. Conclusion zBoth brace and combined rehabilitation treatment can reduce the spinal curve of AIS patients. Both exercise and combined rehabilitation treatment have positive influence on self-image/appearance and satisfaction with management. We support preference of combined rehabilitation treatment above brace treatment.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期507-510,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
基金 supported by the Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Gran(t114119a2700)
关键词 医疗康复 美国 医疗卫生行业 患者护理 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis exercise brace rehabilitation health-related quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Lenssinck ML, Frijlink AC, Berger MY, et al. Effect of brac- ing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: A systematic review of clinical trials|J]. Physical Thera,2005,85(12):1329-1339.
  • 2Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM, et al. Results of the Seolio-sis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical out- come in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study of 244 patients[J]. Spine, 1999,24:1435-1440.
  • 3Parent EC, Hill D, Mahood J, et al. Discriminative and pre- dictive validity of the scoliosis research society-22 question- naire in management and curve-severity subgroups of adoles- cents with idiopathic scoliosis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2009, 34(22):2450-2457.
  • 4Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: rela- tionship to idiopathic scolinsis curve pattern and curve size [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2003,28(1):74-78.
  • 5Bunge EM, Juttmann RE, de Kleuver M, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after treatment: short-term effects after brace or surgical treat- ment[J]. Eur Spine J,2007,16(1):83-89.
  • 6Danielsson AJ, Hasserius R, Ohlin A, et al. Heahh-related quality of life in unlreated versus brace-treated palients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a long-term follow-up[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2010,35(2):199-205.
  • 7Asher MA, Min Lai S, Burton DC. Further development and validation of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcomes instrument[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2000,25(18):2381-2386.
  • 8Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D, et al. The reliability and con- current validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003,28(1):63-69.
  • 9Baldus C, Bridwell KH, Harrast J, et al. Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: are all SRS domains disease specific[J]? Spine (Phila Pa 1976),2008,33(20):2214-2218.
  • 10Zhao L, Zhang Y, Sun X, etal. The Scolinsis Research So- ciety-22 questionnaire adapted for adolescent idiopathic scoli- osis patients in China: reliability and validity analysis[J]. J Child Orthop, 2007,1(6):351-35.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部