期刊文献+

自噬在多发性骨髓瘤细胞系RPMI8226阿霉素耐药中的作用

Autophagy is involved in doxorubicin induced resistance of human myeloma cell line RPMI8226
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨自噬在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)细胞阿霉素(DOX)耐药中的作用。方法用浓度递增法诱导多发性骨髓瘤细胞系RPMI8226细胞建立DOX耐药株RPMI8226/DOX;用M1Tr法测定RPMI8226/DOX细胞耐药倍数;分别用透射电镜、抗LC3一FITC抗体免疫荧光、WesternbIot检测MM细胞自噬情况;AnnexinV/P1标记流式细胞术检测羟氯喹、3-甲基腺嘌呤(3-MA)抑制自噬对DOX诱导RPMI8226/DOX细胞凋亡的影响。结果通过浓度梯度递增法诱导的RPMI8226/DOX细胞,耐药倍数约为10.8,透射电镜下RPMI8226/DOX细胞出现较多自噬体或自噬溶酶体;荧光显微镜下见RPMI8226/D0x细胞出现荧光颗粒;WesternbIot检测结果显示RPMI8226/DOX细胞LC3-Ⅱ蛋白表达水平较RPMI8226细胞升高;流式细胞术检测结果显示:单用8ixmoL/L羟氯喹和10mmoI/L3-MA作用24h后RPMI8226/DOX细胞凋亡率分别为(3.24±1.08)%和(2.81±0.80)%,与空白对照组的(2.12±1.24)%比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);2、4、6μmol/LDOX作用24h后RPMI8226/DOX细胞凋亡率为(9.75±2.15)%、(24.36±2.16)%、(40.51±3.14)%;在此基础上加入8μmol/L羟氯喹后细胞凋亡率分别上升为(16.56±1.89)%、(36.4±2.91)%和(62.68±3.75)%,与单用DOX相比差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);而加用10mmol/L3-MA后细胞凋亡率分别上升为(15.47±1.85)%、(39.28±3.06)%和(55.46±4.07)%,与单用DOX相比差异亦有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论自噬在耐药骨髓瘤细胞中被活化,抑制自噬可部分逆转DOX诱导的骨髓瘤细胞耐药,提示自噬可能为骨髓瘤细胞耐药机制之一。 Objective To explore the role of autophagy in doxorubicin ( DOX)-induced resistance of human myeloma cell line RPMI8226. Methods We established doxorubicin induced resistant subline of my- eloma cell line RPMI8226/DOX by drug concentration step-elevation method. Resistant index of DOX was measured by MTY assay. Autophagy of myeloma cell lines RPMI8226/s and RPMI8226/DOX was detected by transmission electron microscopy, immunofluorescence (LC3-FITC) and western blot respectively. Apoptosis of RPMI8226/DOX cells induced by DOX combined with autophagic inhibitor hydroxychloroquine or 3-MA was identified by Annexin V-FITC/PI double fluorescence dyeing. Results Resistant index of RPMI8226/ DOX was approximately 10.8 fold of that of RPMI8226/S. Electron microscopic studies revealed that most of RPMI8226/DOX cells displayed viable attributes and contained numerous autophagic vacuoles. Fluorescent images of RPMI8226/DOX cells showed a punctuate distribution in LC3 protein. Increased LC3- II protein in RPMI8226/DOX cells was determined by immunoblotting. There were no differences among 8 μmol/L HCQ ( 3.24± 1.08 )%, 10 mmol/L 3-MA ( 2.81±0.80) % or control [ (2.12 ±1.24) % ] ( P 〉 0.05 ) in terms of Annexin V-FITC/PI double fluorescence dyeing; Compared with apoptosis of (9. 75 ± 2. 15 )%, (24.36±2.16)% and (40.51±3.14)% of RPMI8226/DOX cells under 2, 4 and 6 μmol/L DOX, apoptosis increased signifcantly after 24 h incubation under 2, 4 and 6μmol/L DOX combined with 8 μmol/L HCQ as of [ ( 16.56±1.89) %, (36.44±2.91 ) % and (62.68±3.75 ) %, respectively ], or under 2, 4and 6 txmol/L DOX combined with 10 mmol/L 3-MA as of ~ ( 15.47±1.85 ) %, ( 39.28 ± 3.06 ) % and (55.46 ±4.07 ) %, respectively I ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Autophagy was involved in doxombicin-in- duced resistance of myeloma cell line RPMI8226, DOX resistance in myeloma cells was reversed partly by au- tophagy inhibitor hydroxyehloroquine or 3-MA, and autopahgy may be one of mechanisms for drug resistance.
出处 《中华血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期489-492,共4页 Chinese Journal of Hematology
关键词 多药耐药 自噬 RPMI8226细胞 阿霉素 Myeloma Drug resistance Autophagy RPMI8226 cells Doxorubicin
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1潘耀柱,王璇,白海,王存邦.自噬与肿瘤[J].肿瘤防治研究,2011,38(9):1082-1085. 被引量:6
  • 2Dalton WS, Durie BG, Alberts DS, et al. Characterization of anew drug-resistant human myeloma cell line that expresses P-glyco-protein. Cancer Res, 1986,46 :5125-5130.
  • 3Pan Y, Gao Y, Chen L,et al. Targeting autophagy augments invitro and in vivo antimyeloma activity of DNA-damaging chemo-therapy. Clin Cancer Res, 2011 ,17:3248-3258.
  • 4Liang XH, Jackson S, Seaman M, et al. Induction of autophagyand inhibition of tumorigenesis by beclin 1, Nature, 1999 ,402 :672-676.
  • 5Qu X,Yu J, Bhagat G, et al. Promotion of tumorigenesis by het-erozygous disruption of the beclin 1 autophagy gene. J Clin Invest,2003’112:1809-1820.
  • 6Li J, Hou N, Faried A, et al. Inhibition of autophagy by 3-MAenhances the effect of 5-FU-induced apoptosis in colon cancercells. Ann Surg Oncol ,2009 ,16 :761 -771.
  • 7Carew JS, Kelly KR,Nawrocki ST. Autophagy as a target forcancer therapy: new developments. Cancer Manag Res, 2012,4:357-365.
  • 8Sato K, Tsuohihara K, Fujii S, et al. Autophagy is activated incolorectal cancer cells and contributes to the tolerance to nutrientdeprivation. Cancer Res, 2007 ,67 :9677-9684.
  • 9Fujii S, Mitsunaga S, Yamazaki M,et al. Autophagy is activatedin pancreatic cancer cells and correlates with poor patient outcome.Cancer Sci, 2008,99: 1813-1819.
  • 10Ahn JH, Lee M. Suppression of autophagy sensitizes multidrugresistant cells towards Src tyrosine kinase specific inhibitor PP2.Cancer Lett, 2011,310: 188-197.

二级参考文献36

  • 1Liang XH, Jackson S, Seaman M, et al. Induction of autophagy and inhibition of tumorigenesis by beclin 1 [J]. Nature, 1999, 402(6762): 672-676.
  • 2Yue Z, Jin S,Yang C et al. Beclin 1, an autophagy gene essen- tial for early embryonic development, is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100 (25) : 15077-15082.
  • 3Hoyer-Hansen M, Bastholm L, Mathiasen IS, et al. Vitamin D analog EBI089 triggers dramatic lysosomal changes and Beclin 1-mediated autophagic cell death[J]. Cell Death Differ, 2005,12(10) : 1297-1309.
  • 4Liang C, Feng P, Ku B, et al. Autophagic and tumour sup- pressor activity of a novel Beclin l-binding protein UVRAG [J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2006, 8(7):688-699.
  • 5Takahashi Y, Coppola D, Matsushita N, et al. Bif-1 interacts with I3eclin 1 through UVRAG and regulates autophagy and tumorigenesis[J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2007, 9(10)1142-1151.
  • 6Eisenberg-Lerner A, Kimchi A. The paradox of autophagy and its implication in cancer etiology and therapy[J].Apoptosis, 2009, 14(4) :376-391.
  • 7Komatsu M, Waguri S, Koike M, et al. Homeostatie levels of p62 control cytoplasmic inclusion body formation in autophagy- deficient mice[J]. Cell, 2007, 131(6) 11149-1163.
  • 8Sakai Y, Oku M, van der Klei IJ, et al. Pexophagy: autoph- agic degradation of peroxisomes[J]. Bioehim Biophys Acta, 2006, 1763(12) : 1767-1775.
  • 9Mathew R, Kongara S, Beaudoin B, et al. Autophagy suppresses tumor progression by limiting chromosomal instability. Genes Dev, 2007, 21 ( 11 ) 1367-1381.
  • 10Ahn CH, Jeong EG, Lee JW, et al. Expression of beclin-l, an autophagy-related protein, in gastric and colorectal cancers [J]. APMIS, 2007, 115(12): 1344-1349.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部