期刊文献+

负重时间对小面积距骨骨软骨损伤微骨折术疗效的影响 被引量:3

EFFECT OF WEIGHT-BEARING TIME ON MICRO-FRACTURE THERAPY FOR SMALL SIZED OSTEOCHONDRAL LESION OF TALUS
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过术后早期及延迟负重比较,探讨小面积距骨骨软骨损伤(osteochondral lesion of the talus,OLT)行微骨折术后负重时间对疗效的影响,为指导术后康复锻炼提供依据。方法选择2010年3月-2011年9月收治的小面积OLT(<2 cm2)拟行微骨折术治疗的患者43例,随机分为术后早期负重组(n=22)和延迟负重组(n=21)。两组患者性别、年龄、体重指数、病程、损伤原因、术前疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),具有可比性。两组患者均于关节镜下行关节面清理及微骨折术治疗。早期负重组患者术后即在"8"字护踝保护下完全负重,延迟负重组患者6周后开始逐渐负重。结果术中关节镜下测量,早期负重组软骨损伤面积为(1.24±0.35)cm2,延迟负重组为(1.25±0.42)cm2,损伤面积比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.09,P=0.93);两组软骨损伤分级比较差异亦无统计学意义(Z=—1.45,P=0.15)。术后两组患者均获随访,随访时间12~18个月,平均14.5个月。两组术后各时间点VAS及AOFAS评分均较术前显著改善(P<0.05);术后3、6、12个月两组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。早期负重组回归工作时间为(6.35±1.93)个月,显著早于延迟负重组的(8.75±1.48)个月(t=—4.10,P=0.00)。结论对于小面积OLT,微骨折术后早期负重与延迟负重近期疗效相似,但早期负重患者回归工作时间显著提前。 Objective To evaluate the effect of weight-bearing time on micro-fracture therapy for small sized osteochondral lesion of the talus(OLT) by comparing early weight-bearing and postponed weight-bearing.Methods Between March 2010 and September 2011,43 patients with small sized OLT( 2 cm2) scheduled for arthroscopic micro-fracture therapy were randomly divided into early weight-bearing group(n=22) and postponed weight-bearing group(n=21).There was no significant difference in gender,age,body mass index,disease duration,disease cause,preoperative visual analogue scale(VAS) score,and preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society(AOFAS) score between 2 groups(P 0.05).All patients of 2 groups received micro-fracture treatment under arthroscopy.Full weight bearing began under the protection of "8" figure shaped splint at immediately after operation in early weight-bearing group,and weight bearing began at 6 weeks after operation in postponed weight-bearing group.Results The size of cartilage injury was(1.24 ± 0.35) cm2 in early weight-bearing group and was(1.25?± 0.42) cm2 in postponed weight-bearing group by arthroscopy measurement,showing no significant difference between 2 groups(t=0.09,P=0.93);and there was no significant difference in cartilage injury grading between 2 groups(Z= —1.45,P=0.15).The follow-up time was 12-18 months(mean,14.5 months) in 2 groups.VAS and AOFAS scores of each group at each time point after operation were all significantly improved when compared with preoperative scores(P 0.05),but no significant difference was found between 2 groups at 3,6,and 12 months after operation(P 0.05).The time of returning to work in early weight-bearing group [(6.35?± 1.93) months] was significantly shorter than that in postponed weight-bearing group [(8.75 ± 1.48)?months](t= —4.10,P=0.00).Conclusion For patients with small sized OLT,early weight-bearing and postponed weight-bearing after micro-fracture therapy under arthroscopy have similar short-term results.But patients undergoing early weight-bearing can earlier return to work than patients undergoing postponed weight-bearing.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期657-661,共5页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
关键词 距骨骨软骨损伤 微骨折术 负重时间 关节功能 Osteochondral lesion of the talus Micro-fracture therapy Weight-bearing time Joint function
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Orr JD, Dutton JR, Fowler JT. Anatomic location and morphology of symptomatic, operatively treated osteochondral lesions of the talus. Foot Ankle Int, 2012, 33(12): 1051-1057.
  • 2Giannini S, Buda R, Battaglia M, et al. One-step repair in talar osteo- chondral lesions: 4-year clinical results and t2-mapping capability in outcome prediction. Am 1 Sports Med, 2013, 41(3): 511-518.
  • 3Kim YS, Park EH, Kim YC, et al. Factors associated with the clinical outcomes of the osteochondral autograft transfer system inosteochon- dral lesions of the talus: second-look arthroscopic evaluation. Am l Sports Med, 2012, 40(12): 2709-2719.
  • 4刘畅,施新革,刘玉杰,王志刚,魏民.关节镜手术与非手术治疗踝关节退行性骨关节病的疗效比较[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2012,26(11):1315-1318. 被引量:14
  • 5Kok AC, Dunnen SD, Tuijthof GI, et al. Is technique performance a prognostic factor in bone marrow stimulation of the talus? J Foot Ankle Surg, 2012, 51(6): 777-782.
  • 6Becher C, Thermann H. Results of microfracture in the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus. Foot Ankle Int, 2005, 26(8): 583- 589.
  • 7Ferkel RD, Zanotti RM, Komenda GA, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic osteochondral lesions of the talus: long-term results. Am l Sports Med, 2008, 36(9): 1750-1762.
  • 8Kuni B, Schmitt H, Chloridis D, et al. Clinical and MRI results after microfracture of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Arch Orthop Trau- ma Surg, 2012, 132(12): 1765-1771.
  • 9Bae DK, Yoon KH, Song S]. Cartilage healing after microfracture in osteoarthritic knees. Arthroscopy, 2006, 22(4): 367-374.
  • 10Gobbi A, Francisco RA, Lubowitz JH, et al. Osteochondral lesions of the talus: randomized controlled trial comparing chondroplasty, mi- crofracture, and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Arthroscopy, 2006, 22(10): 1085-1092.

二级参考文献18

  • 1Olson KM, Dairyko GH Jr, Toolan BC. Salvage of chronic instability of the syndesmosis with distal tibiofibular arthrodesis: functional and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2011, 93(1): 66-72.
  • 2Saltzman CL, Salamon ML, Blanchard GM, et al. Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consectutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopaedic center. Iowa Orthop J, 2005, 25: 44-46.
  • 3Loong TW, Mitra AK, Tan SK. Role of arthroscopy in ankle disorder-early experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 1994, 23(3): 348-350.
  • 4Brennan SA, Rahim F, Dowling J, et al. Arthroscopic debridement for soft tissue ankle impingement. Ir J Med Sci, 2012, 181(2): 253-256.
  • 5Boc SF, Muscarella V. Clinics in Podiatric medicine and surgery. Prefact Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2012, 29(1): ⅩⅤ-ⅩⅥ.
  • 6Harris TG, Lee D. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis after tibial pilon open reduction internal fixation. Foot Ankle Spec, 2011, 4(3): 188-193.
  • 7Giannoudis PV. Practical procedures in elective orthopaedic surgery London: Springer, 2012, 5: 249-253.
  • 8Ahlb?ck S, Rydberg J. X-ray classification and examination technics in gonarthrosis. Lakartidningen, 1980, 77(22): 2091-2093, 2096.
  • 9Moon JS, Shim JC, Suh JS, et al. Radiographic predictability of cartilage damage in medial ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(8): 2188-2197.
  • 10Richmond J, Hunter D, Irrgang J, et al. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee (nonarthroplasty). J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2009, 17(9): 591-600.

共引文献13

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部