期刊文献+

Anatomy of the 3D Innovation Production With the Cobb-Douglas Specification

Anatomy of the 3D Innovation Production With the Cobb-Douglas Specification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper focuses on verifying the relevance of two theoretical propositions and related empirical investigation about the relationship between creativity and entrepreneurship. It draws upon a creativity process that considers three "dimensions" or "disciplines" (3D) critical for creative organizations--within discipline expertise, out of discipline knowledge, and a disciplined creative process. The paper first explores the Cobb-Douglas production function as a relevant tool for modeling the 3D creative process. The next part discusses the 3D process as a production function, which is modeled following the well-known Cobb-Douglas specification. Last, the paper offers implications for future research on disciplined creativity/innovation as a method of improving organizations' creative performance. The modeling shows that labor and investment can readily enter into the 3D creativity process as inputs. These two inputs are meaningful in explaining where innovation outputs come from and how they can be measured, with a reasonable theoretical decomposition. It is not true that the more capital investments in the creativity process, the better the level of innovation production, but firm's human resource management and expenditures should pay attention to optimal levels of capital and labor stocks, in a combination that helps reach highest possible innovation output.
出处 《Sociology Study》 2013年第1期69-78,共10页
关键词 Organization of production firm behavior business economics creativity/innovation processes Cobb-Douglas productionfunction 生产函数 格拉斯 创新 3D 解剖 规格 资本投资 人力资源管理
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献47

  • 1Agresti, A. 2002. Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
  • 2Ahuja, G. and C. M. Lampert. 2001. "Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions." Strategic Management Journal 22 (6/7):521-543.
  • 3Amabile, T. 1996. "Creativity and Innovation in Organizations." Harvard Business School Lecture Note 9-396-239.
  • 4Azen, R. and C. M. Walker. 2011. Categorical Data Analysis for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. New York: Routledge.
  • 5Baker, T., E. Gedajlovic, and M. Lubatkin. 2005. "A Framework for Comparing Entrepreneurship Processes Across Nations." Journal of International Business Studies 36(5):492-504.
  • 6Baumol, W. J. 1990. "Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive." The Journal of Political Economy 98(5):893-921.
  • 7Birzer, B. 1999. "Expanding Creative Destruction: Entrepreneurship in the American Wests." The Western Historical Quarterly 30(1):45-63.
  • 8Bohm, D. 1968. "On Creativity." Leonardo 1(2):137-149.
  • 9Brown, T. E., P. Davidsson, and J. Wiklund. 2001. "An Operationalization of Stevenson's Conceptualization of Entrepreneurship as Opportunity-Based Firm Behavior." Strategic Management Journal 22(10):953-968.
  • 10Chiu, C. and L. Kwan. 2010. "Culture and Creativity: A Process Model." Management and Organization Review 6(3):447-461.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部