期刊文献+

基于人力资本内质优势结构的贡献评析方法 被引量:2

Contribution Evaluation and Analysis Method Based on Advantage Structure of Human Capital Inner Quality
原文传递
导出
摘要 针对合作困境中个体贡献不易独立测量难题,提出基于人力资本内质优势结构的民主评价方法。以最大程度尊重个性优质能力为出发点,提出人力资本内质优势结构的概念及测量技术,将其引入个体寻优模型和民主综合评价方法。能够定量刻画成员各指标优势相对度,客观生成同类优势结构下学习标杆,明晰个体贡献及其差异溯源的功能。具有区别于外在结构而强调内质结构,从最有利于成员的角度确定个性化价值参数,突破传统自上而下的评价模式,依托同行优势表达民主,提高成员信任及优势互补意愿,公平平衡成员利益等优点。通过算例证明了方法的科学性和有效性。 Aiming at the difficulty in measuring individual contribution in teamwork, this paper puts forward a democratic contribution evaluation and analysis method based on human capital inner quality advantage structure. Respecting each one's value as much as possible, the concept of inner advantage structure and measurement technique are put forward, introducing them into individual compliance optimization modeling and democratic comprehensive method, which can describe member each indicator relative superiority degree, quantitatively identifying member different contribution and figure out reason of different members with different contribution. This metbodey emphasizes the endoplasm structure rather than external structure, from the most benefit point to determine individual value parameter, thus breaking through the traditional top-down evaluation model, relying on the advantage of counterparts to expression democracy, trust and intention to advantage complementary, fair to balance the interests of all members. Effectiveness and feasibility of proposed method are illustrated by calculation example.
出处 《系统工程》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第4期72-77,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971016 71261007) 中国博士后基金资助项目(2012M511153) 辽宁省教育厅项目(W2012045 W2012044) 鞍山市哲学社会科学基金资助项目(as20111005)
关键词 人力资本 贡献 民主评析 优势结构 质量 Human Capital Contribution Democratic Evaluation and Analysis Advantage Structure Quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Heneman R L, Hippel C. Balancing group andindividual rewards : Rewarding individual contribu-tions to the team [ J ]. Compensation and BenefitsReview ,1995 ,27 (4) :63-68.
  • 2Wageman R B G. Incentives and cooperation : Thejoint effects of task and reward interdependence ongroup performance [ J ]. Journal of OrganizationalBehavior, 1997,14(18) :139-158.
  • 3Bjorn B. Relative performance or team evaluation-Optimal contracts for other-regarding agents [J].Journal of Economic Behavior Organization .2011,79(3):183-193.
  • 4向常春,龙立荣.团队内冲突对团队效能的影响及作用机制[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(5):781-789. 被引量:16
  • 5李宝斌,许晓东.高校教师评价中教学科研失衡的实证与反思[J].髙等工程教育研究,2011,(2): 76-81.
  • 6华中生,梁梁.一种结合“理想点法”的优势分析法及其应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(8):20-25. 被引量:7
  • 7王新宇,俞书伟.基于系统模糊优选模型的煤炭企业竞争优势评价[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002,22(6):126-130. 被引量:6
  • 8崔杰,党耀国,刘思峰.基于灰色关联度求解指标权重的改进方法[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(5):141-145. 被引量:98
  • 9Lee H S,Chu C W,Zhu J. Super-efficiency DEA inthe presence of feasibility [J]. European Journal ofOperational Research,2011,212(1):141 -147.
  • 10Ployhart R E,Moliterno T P. Emergence of thehuman capital resource : A multilevel modelCJ]. TheAcademy of Management Review,2011,36(1) : 127-150.

二级参考文献100

共引文献144

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部