期刊文献+

基于大数据的h指数及其衍生指数的探索性因子分析研究 被引量:4

Exploratory Factor Analysis on H-Index and its Derivative Indexes Based on Big Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 h指数自2005年被Jorge E.Hirsch提出后,因其具有计算简单和适用范围广等特点而引发了学术界的广泛关注。许多研究者在h指数的基础上,对h指数进行修正,并提出了多种衍生指数。为深入了解这些同源性衍生指数间的关系,评估它们在不同层次人才评价中的应用效果,选择15种主要类h指数,以2008-2011年SCIE收录的农业科学领域114643篇论文为研究对象,采用探索性因子分析方法对15种指数进行相关性分析,结果表明在大数据情况下A指数和m指数与作者论文质量密切相关;g指数、h_w指数和R指数能更好地评价高产高被引作者;h_w指数和χ指数在评价高产低被引作者时效果较好;π指数、χ指数、m指数、A指数、h_w指数、e指数对低产高被引作者评价效果较好。 Since Jorge E. Hirsch proposed the h index in 2005, this indietor has been focused on by academia because of its characteristic of simple calculation and wide application. Many researchers made a lot of work to revise it, and proposed many types of derivative h indexes. In order to find out clearly the homology relationship among these indictors, this article selected 114 643 articles of ESI Agrieultural Scienee from SCIE database during 2008 to 2011 , to analyze their correlation by Exploratory Factor Analysis. The results showed that: in the ease of big data, A Index and m Index are closely related to the quality of articles; g Index, h Index and R Index are better to evaluate higher production and higher citation authors; h Index and X Index are better for higher production and lower citation authors; π Index, X Index, m Index, A Index, hπ Index, e Index are hetter for lower produc, tion and higher citation authors.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第10期110-115,共6页 Library and Information Service
关键词 H指数 类h指数 人才评价 因子分析 H-Index derivative h indexes personnel evaluation factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output [ J ]. PNAS,2005,102 ( 46 ) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 2Egghe L. Theory and practice of the g-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006,69( I ) :131 - 152.
  • 3金碧辉,Rousseau Ronald.R指数、AR指数:h指数功能扩展的补充指标[J].科学观察,2007,2(3):1-8. 被引量:178
  • 4Rousseau R,Guns R. Real and rational variants of the h-index and the g-index[ J ]. Journal of lnfonnetrics,2009,3( 1 ) :64 -71.
  • 5J.E.Hirsch,刘俊婉,马建华.衡量科学家个人成就的一个量化指标[J].科学观察,2006,1(1):2-7. 被引量:60
  • 6Jin Bihui. H-index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist [J]. Science Focus,2006, 1 ( 1 ) :8 - 9.
  • 7Bornmann L, Mutz R. Daniel H D. Are there- better indices for evaluation purposes titan the h- index? A comparison of nine different wtriants of the h index using data from Biomedicine[ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology ,2008,59 ( 5 ) :830 - 837.
  • 8Zhang Chunting. The e-index, complementing the h-index for excess citations [J]. PLoS One ,2009 ( 4 ) : e5429.
  • 9Kosmulski M. A new Hirseh-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index [ J ]. ISSI Newsletter, 2006,2 (3) :4 -6.
  • 10Wu Qiang. The w-index: A measure to assess scientific impaet by focusing on widely cited papers[ J ]. Journal of the American Soeiely for Information Science and Technology ,2010,61 ( 3 ) :609 - 614.

二级参考文献88

共引文献278

同被引文献124

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部