期刊文献+

局部特征与多示例学习结合的超声图像分类方法 被引量:16

Combining Local Features and Multi-instance Learning for Ultrasound Image Classification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用全局特征对超声图像进行描述具有一定的局限性,而且对图像进行手工标注的成本过高,为解决上述问题,本文提出了一种利用局部特征描述超声图像,并结合多示例学习对超声图像进行分类的新方法.粗略定位图像中的感兴趣区域(Region of interest,ROI),并提取局部特征,将感兴趣区域看作由局部特征构成的示例包,采用自组织映射(Self-organizing map,SOM)的方法对示例特征进行矢量量化,采用Bag of words方法将示例特征映射到示例包空间,进而采用传统的支持向量机对示例包进行分类.本文提出的方法在临床超声图像上进行了实验,实验结果表明,该方法具有良好的泛化能力和较高的准确性. The method to describe ultrasound images using global features has some limitation. And it has a high cost to manually annotate the region of interest (ROI). To solve the above problems, local features are used to describe ultrasound images. A multi-instance learning method for ultrasound image classification is proposed. The ROI is roughly located and local features are extracted. The ROI is considered as a bag which is composed of local features. The self-organizing map (SOM) method is used for vector quantization and the bag of words method is used to map instance features to bag features. Then the classical support vector machine is used to classify the bags. The method proposed by this paper is tested by clinical ultrasound images. The results show that the method has a good generalization ability and has a high accuracy.
出处 《自动化学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期861-867,共7页 Acta Automatica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金(61073128 61100097 60973077)资助~~
关键词 图像分类 局部特征 多示例学习 超声图像 Image classification local feature multi-instance learning ultrasound image
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Chen D R, Lai H W. Three-dimensional ultrasonography for breast malignancy detection. Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics, 2011, 5(3): 253-261.
  • 2Cheng H D, Shan J, Ju W, Guo Y H, Zhang L. Auto- mated breast cancer detection and classification using ultra- sound images: a survey. Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(1): 299-317.
  • 3Moon W K, Shen Y W, Huang C S, Chiang L R, Chang R F. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.Ul- trasound in Medicine and Biology, 2011, 37(4): 539-548.
  • 4Garra B S, Krasner B H, Horii S C, Ascher S, Mun S K, Zeman R K. Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis. Ultrasonic Imaging, 1993, 15(4): 267-285.
  • 5Ren J C. ANN vs. SVM: which one performs better in clas- sification of MCCs in mammogram imaging. Knowledge- Based Systems, 2012, 26:144-153.
  • 6Sahiner B, Chan H P, Roubidoux M A, Hadjiiski L M, Helvie M A, Paramagul C, Bailey J, Nees A V, Blane C. Malig- nant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images:effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology, 2007, 242(3): 716-724.
  • 7Wagner R F, Smith S W, Sandrik J M, Lopez H. Statistics of speckle in ultrasound B-scans and Ultrasonics, 1983, 30(3): IEEE Transactions on Sonics 156 - 163.
  • 8Liu B, Cheng H D, Huang J H, Tian J W, Tang X L, Liu J F. Fully automatic and segmentation-robust classification of breast tumors based on local texture analysis of ultrasound images. Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(1): 280-298.
  • 9Dietterich T G, Lathrop R H, Lozano-Perez T. Solving the multiple-instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Ar- titlcial Inteligence, 1997, 89(1-2): 31-71.
  • 10Garcia S, Derrac J, Cano J R, Herrera F. Prototype selection for nearest neighbor classification: taxonomy and empirical study. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012, 34(3): 417-435.

同被引文献160

引证文献16

二级引证文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部