期刊文献+

非语言性认知功能评估量表的验证 被引量:22

Validation of the Non-Language-Based Cognitive Assessment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的编制适用于失语患者认知功能评估的非语言性神经心理测验量表(Non-Language-Based Cognlitive Assessment,NLCA)并进行信度和效度检验。方法73例正常受试者和30例轻度认知损害患者均接受NLCA和简易智能状态检查量表(Mini-Mental State Examination,MMSE)评估。从正常受试者样本中随机选gx40例完成NLCA重测以及听觉词语学习测验、Rey-Osterrieth复杂图形测验(甲式)、Stroop色词干扰测验、瑞文标准推理测验A部分以及WAIS数字广度测验。结果NLCA的内部一致性良好(Cronbach α系数为0.836,评分者间复测相关性为0.895~0.953,2~6周后复测相关性为0.863~0.952)。受教育年限与NLCA评分显著相关(r=0.852,P〈0.01)。以蒙特利尔认知评估量表为诊断标准时,接受者操作特征曲线下面积为0.899(95%可信区间0.827~0.972)。选取70分为诊断截断值时,NLCA识别轻度认知损害患者的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值均较高。结论NLCA具有良好的信度和效度,是一种符合神经心理测验基本要求的有效认知功能评估方法。 Objective To develop the Non-Language-Based Cognitive Assessment (NLCA) appficable to patients with aphasia and to validate the reliability and vafidity of NLCA. Methods Seventy-three normal subjects and 32 patients with mild cognitive impairment were evaluated by the NLCA and the Mini-Mental State Examination. Forty subjects were randomly selected from the normal subject samples were assessed with the NLCA, the Auditory Verbal Learning Test, the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (Form A), the Stroop Color-Word Interference Test, the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices (Part A), and the WAIS Digit Span Test. Results The NLCA had high inter-rater agreement (Cronbach's α coefficient 0. 836), reliability among the assessors 0. 895 - 0. 953, test-retest reliability 0. 863 - 0. 952 at at a 2-6 week interval. The years of education was significantly correlated with NLCA (r = 0. 852, r 〈 0. 01). When the Montreal Cognitive Assessment was used as diagnostic criteria, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0. 899 (95% confidence interval 0. 827 - 0. 972). When cutoff at 70, the NLCA had had high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value in the identification of patients with mild cognitive impairment. Conclusions The NLCA has good reliability and validity. It is an effective cognitive function assessment that meets the basic requirements of the neuropsychological tests.
出处 《国际脑血管病杂志》 北大核心 2013年第4期282-287,共6页 International Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases
关键词 认知障碍 神经心理学测验 失语 Cognition Disorders Neuropsychological Tests Aphasia
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Moorhouse P, Rockwood K. Vascular cognitive impairment: current concepts and clinical developments. Lancet Neurol, 2008, 7: 246-255.
  • 2Rom6n GC. Vascular dementia may be the most common form of dementia in the elderly. J Neurol Sci, 2002, 203-204: 7-10.
  • 3Wentzel C, Rockwood K, MacKnight C, et al. Progression of impairment in patients with vascular cognitive impairment withoutdementia. Neurology, 2001, 57: 714-716.
  • 4Dolan H, Crain B, Troncoso J, et al. Atherosclerosis, dementia, and Alzheirner disease in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging cohort. Ann Nenrol, 2010, 68: 231-240.
  • 5Godeffoy O, Dubois C, Debachy B, et al. Vascular aphasias: main characteristics of patients hospitalized in acute stroke units. Stroke, 2002, 33:702-705.
  • 6Kauhanen ML, Korpelalnen JT, Hiltunen P, et al. Aphasi, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2000, 10: 455-461.
  • 7Kalbe E, Reinhold N, Brand M, et al. A new test battery to assess aphasic disturbances and associated cognitive dysfunctions-Genmn nonrive data on the aphasia check list. J Clin E Neuropsychol, 2005, 27: 779-794.
  • 8van Mourik M, Verschaeve M, Boon P, et al. Cogaition in global aphasia: indicators for therapy. Aphasiology, 1992, 6: 491-499.
  • 9龚耀先.修订韦氏成人量表手册.长沙:湖南医学院,1983.
  • 10郭起浩,吕传真,洪震.听觉词语记忆测验在中国老人中的试用分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2001,15(1):13-15. 被引量:75

二级参考文献20

  • 1龚耀先.修订韦氏记忆量表手册[Z].长沙:湖南医学院,1983..
  • 2弗雷德里克·C·巴特莱特,记忆:一个实验的与社会的心理学研究,1998年,2页
  • 3张明圆,精神科评定量表手册,1993年,185页
  • 4龚耀先,中国修订韦氏成人智力量表手册,1992年
  • 5龚耀先,修订韦氏记忆量表手册,1983年
  • 6Pierre C.Age-related cognitive decline,mild cognitive impairment or preclinical Alzheimer's disease?Annals of Medicine,2000,32(1):6.
  • 7Petersen RC, Stevens JC, Ganguli M, et al. Practice parameter: early detection of dementia: mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review). Neurology, 2001, 56(9) :1133.
  • 8Visser PJ, Verhey FRJ, Scheltens P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the preclinical AD Scale (PAS) in cognitively mildly impaired subjects. J Neurol, 2002, 249(3) :312.
  • 9Katz N,Itzkovich M,Averbuch S,et al.Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients:reliability and validity.Am J Occup Ther,1989,43:184-192.
  • 10Katz N,Elazar B,Itzkovich M.Construct validity of a geriatric version of the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) Battery.Phys Occup Ther Geriatr,1995,13:31-46.

共引文献113

同被引文献232

引证文献22

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部