摘要
考虑法律规避行为的违法性,两大法系国家均采取了措施对其进行规制,但是两大法系的规制途径并不相同,大陆法系国家主要是通过法律规避制度直接规制法律规避行为,而英美法系国家则通过公共政策、政府利益分析等灵活方法间接规制法律规避行为。鉴于强制性规则适用制度无法涵盖法律规避制度、英美法律规避的替代性制度无法适用中国、法律规避制度的自身价值,便可以略知我国立法应全面承认法律规避制度,提高法律规避的立法位阶,配套相应具体的司法解释。
Considering the illegality of the evasion of law, the main countries of two fundamental systems of law all take measures to regulate it, but their measures of regulation are not the same. The continental law countries establish the system of evasion of law to regulate it directly while the countries of Anglo-American law system adopt the flexible methods such as public policy and the government benefit analysis to regulate it directly. Because mandatory rules regime cannot cover the evasion of law, the evasion of iaw's alternative system in Britain and American can't apply to China. The regime of the eva- sion of law has its values and should be acknowledged in our country. The legislation status should be improved and the rele- vant and specific judicial interpretation should be matched.
出处
《三明学院学报》
2013年第3期49-52,共4页
Journal of Sanming University