协商型正义:律师妨害民事诉讼行为公开方式的新探索

The Peliberative Justice:Way of Pubicity about the Acts of Hampering of Civil Proceedings

当律师出现妨害民事诉讼的代理行为,导致当事人应有权益无法通过正常的审判活动得以有效实现的时候,法院必须对律师这种代理行为的偏差予以公开,这是防止逆向选择导致法院司法功能无法实现的必要手段。但是,作为传统的公开方式,法院直接对律师采取民事诉讼强制措施明显带有单向惩罚性色彩,且并非所有情况下都能起到积极作用。相反,在某些案件中强制措施的使用惯性还表现出纠纷解决的价值功能不足、适用程序司法公信力不高等弊端。这种困境的症结源于对司法正义多维角度理解的局限所导致的公开手段过于单一和机械,亟待完善和创新。而以权衡理论中的哈贝马斯商谈论为内核的协商型司法正义理念及其实施手段的引入,可以有效弥补现有制度的短板和不足。在此理念下,运用帕累托最优的选择开创性地提出应当构建法院与律师事务所主任的协商机制,并通过以协商效用以及律师妨害民事诉讼行为严重程度为函数变量的动态分析,确定协商机制适用的案件类型,作为既有公开方式的必要补充,进而阐明该协商机制与相关制度的协调。

When lawyers have the acts of hampering of civil proceedings, resulting the rights of the parties cannot be effectively accomplished through the normal trial activities, the court must make public the deviation of their behavior. However, as the traditional way of publicity, the court＇ s taking compulsory measures of civil action directly on lawyers has unidirectional punitive characteristics, and not all cases can play a positive role. Instead, the using inertia of compulsory measures in some cases appears malpractices, such as the insufficiency of dispute settlement value, the lack of credibility of justice applicable procedures, and so on. The author thinks, the stick point of predicament lies in the single and mechanical ways of publicity, which is caused by the limitation of multi - dimensional perspective understanding of judicial justice, and it is requiring to be perfected and bring forth new ideas. The introduction of the deliberative justice and its means of implementation, which is to the core of Habermas＇ s Discourse in Trade - off theory, can effectively ~compensate for the shortcomings and deficiencies of the existing system. In this concept, the author initiatively raises an issue that we should structure a consultation mechanism between courts and direetors of law firms, with the choice of Pareto Optimality. In this paper, you can determine the types of cases for the consultation mechanism, via the dynamical analysis basis on consultation utility and the severity of the lawyers＇ obstruction of civil proceedings. The author not only make a supplementary description for the existing ways of public, but also clarity the coordination between the consultation mechanism and interrelated systems.