期刊文献+

代理移动IPv6下子网移动方案的实现与分析 被引量:4

Implementation and analysis of network mobility under proxy mobile IPv6
原文传递
导出
摘要 代理移动IPv6是基于网络的移动性管理方案,其标准RFC5213中只规范了对单个节点的移动性支持,缺乏对子网移动的研究。研究了现有的3种代理移动IPv6下基于隧道的子网移动方案,重点分析了代理移动IPv6下采用隧道分离思想的移动子网实现方法 N-NEMO(network based NEMO),并在Linux环境下采用C语言对3种方案分别给予实现,对3种子网移动方案进行性能分析和对比,结果表明,虽然N-NEMO的切换时延较大且信令较为复杂,但是具有网络层头部开销小及支持节点类型全面的优点。 Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) is a network-based mobility management scheme. Its standard RFC5213 only sup- ports host mobility but not subnet mobility. In this paper, we investigate three existing subnet mobility schemes based on tunnel under PMIPv6 and analyze N-NEMO(Network based NEMO)which adopts split tunnel. We perform three schemes using C language in Linux. By analyzing and comparing the three schemes, we obtain that although N-NEMO has large de- lay and complex signaling, it has the advantage of low network layer header and can support more node types.
出处 《重庆邮电大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期372-378,共7页 Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2012BAH06B01) 国家自然基金(61271201)~~
关键词 代理移动IPV6 子网移动 隧道分离 分层注册 PMIPv6 NEMO split tunnel hierarchical registration
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1DEVARPALLI D,WAKIKAWA D,PETRESCU A.RFC3963:Network Mobility(NEMO)Basic Support Protocol[S].[ s.l.]:Network Working Group,2005:2-25.
  • 2ZHAO Fei,VIEHLAND D.Key Applications for Successof Personal Area Networks,Mobile Business [ C]// Pro-ceeding ICMB 09 Proceedings of the 2009 Eighth Interna-tional Conference on Mobile Business.Washington,DC,USA:IEEE Computer Society,2009 ; 227-232.
  • 3李雪霞,郜帅,王利利,张宏科.一种基于标识分离映射网络的子网移动性管理方案[J].重庆邮电大学学报(自然科学版),2012,24(1):83-89. 被引量:1
  • 4张家波,文展,张治中.基于IPv6的快速切换改进方案[J].数字通信,2009,36(3):20-24. 被引量:2
  • 5QU Zhao-wei,Lü Ting-jie.QoS Management Structure for Mobile IPv6[J].The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications,2005,12(4):6-10. 被引量:1
  • 6GUNDAVELLI S,LEUNG K,DEVARAPALLI V,et al.RFC5213:Proxy Mobile IPv6 [ S].[s.l.]:NetworkWorking Group,2008:3-24.
  • 7PERKINS C,JOHNSON D,ARKKO J.RFC6275:Mob-ility Support in IPv6 [ S].[ s.l.]:Network WorkingGroup,2011:8-19.
  • 8SIMPSON W.RFC1853:IP in IP Tunneling [ S].[s.l.]:Network Working Group,1995:3-10.
  • 9ERNST T,LACH H-Y.RFC 4885:Network MobilitySupport Terminology [ S].[s.l.]:Network WorkingGroup,2007:1-20.
  • 10SOTO I,BERNARDOS C J,CALDERON M,et al.NEMO-Enabled Localized Mobility Support for InternetAccess in Automotive Scenarios [ J].IEEE Communica-tions Magazine,2009,47(5):152-159.

二级参考文献35

共引文献1

同被引文献21

  • 1刘俊.中兴传输设备子网分割的一个简易方法[J].电信技术,2004(9):52-53. 被引量:1
  • 2延志伟.基于MIPv6/PMIPv6的移动性支持关键技术研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2011.
  • 3DURAND A,DROMS R,WOODYATT J. Dual-stack lite broadband deployments following IPv4 exhaustion[S].IETF RFC 6333,2011.
  • 4BAGNULO M,MATTHEWS P,VAN BEIJNUM I. Stateful NAT64:Network address and protocol translation from IPv6 clients to IPv4 servers[S].IETF RFC 6146,2011.
  • 5LI X,BAO C,BAKER F. IP/ICMP translation algorithm[S].IETF RFC 6145,2011.
  • 6GundavelliS,LeungK,DevarapalliVeta1.ProxyMobile1Pv6[S].RFC5213,2008:3-30.
  • 7Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J. Mobility Support in IPv6[S]. RFC3775, 2004: 5-10.
  • 8Abinader F, Gundavelli S, Leung K, et al. Bulk Binding Update Support for Proxy Mobile IPv6[S]. RFC6602, 2012: 1-23.
  • 9Perkins C, Johnson D, Arkko J. Mobility Support in IPv6[S]. RFC6275, 2011:8-19.
  • 10吴大鹏.IPv6的发展与现状[J].数字通信,2010,37(2):22-24. 被引量:5

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部