期刊文献+

国际投资法之公平公正待遇 被引量:9

原文传递
导出
摘要 自20世纪末以来,公平公正待遇已悄然成为国际投资仲裁当事人博弈的焦点之一。学界与实务界对公平公正待遇的适用标准及其内容颇有争议。通过对近期投资仲裁案件的考察,可以发现公平公正待遇并非等同于国际最低待遇标准,它应是一项独立适用的国际投资法原则。
作者 王衡 惠坤
出处 《法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期84-92,共9页 Law Science
基金 霍英东教育基金会资助研究课题"区域服务贸易法解释学研究"(131109) 双语教学示范课程建设项目"国际贸易法成案分析" 重庆市高等教育教学改革研究重点项目"国际经济法双语案例教学改革与实践研究"(112049) 重庆市高校青年骨干教师资助计划"服务贸易法前沿问题研究"的研究成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Andrew Newcombe and Lluis Paradell, Law and Practice of International Investment Treaties : Standard of Treatment, The Netherlands : Kluwer Law International BV,2009, footnote 121, p. 256.
  • 2Organization for Economic and Co - Operation Development, Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property, Art. 1 ( a ), http :// www. oecd. org/dataoecd/35/4/39286571, pdf,last visit on May 5,2013.
  • 3Stephen Vasciannie,The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice, British Yearbook of In- ternational Law, 1999, pp. 111 - 114.
  • 4Christoph Schreuer, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice, Journal of World Trade and Investment, Vol. 6,2005, p. 359.
  • 5Rudolf Dolzer and Christoph Schreuer, Principle of International Investment Law, Oxford University Press,2008, p. 353.
  • 6徐崇利.公平与公正待遇:真义之解读[J].法商研究,2010,27(3):59-68. 被引量:34
  • 7《加拿大FIPA范本》第5条.
  • 8Chinese Model BIT Version I, Art. 3. Transfer from Norah Gallagher and Wenhua Shan, Chinese Investment Treaties: Policies and Practice, Oxford University Press,2009, p. 422.
  • 9Chinese Model BIT Version II, Art. 2. Transfer from Norah Gallagher and Wenhua Shan, Chinese Investment Treaties: Policies and Practice, Oxford University Press,2009, 第428页.
  • 10Chinese Model BIT Version III, Art. 3. Transfer from Norah Gallagher and Wenhua Shan, Chinese Investment Treaties: Policies and Practice, Oxford University Press,2009, 第434页.

二级参考文献76

  • 1季卫东.法律程序的意义——对中国法制建设的另一种思考[J].中国社会科学,1993(1):83-103. 被引量:741
  • 2J. Kalieki &. S. Medeiros, Fair, Equitable and Ambiguous: What Is Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law?, ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, Vol. 22, 2007.
  • 3T. J. Westcott, Recent Practice on Fair and Equitabie Treatment, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 8, 2007.
  • 4International Thunderbird Gaming Corporation v. United Mexican States, http://ita. law. uvic. ca/documents/ThunderbirdAward. pdf, 2009- 12- 24.
  • 5Azurix Corp. v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12.
  • 6B. Choudhury, Evolution or Devoluton? Defining Fair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, 2005.
  • 7C. Schreuer, Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice, The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 6, 2005.
  • 8OECD, International Investment Law: A Changing Landscape, Chapter 3-Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law, 2005, pp. 103- 124 .
  • 9C. McLachlan QC, L. Shore, M. Weiniger & L. Mistelis, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles, Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 226-243.
  • 10R. Dolzer & C. Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law, Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 133-149.

同被引文献62

引证文献9

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部