摘要
作为一种兼具政治性与法律性争端解决方法,WTO争端机制中的磋商在制度设计方面具有显著的特点。在对磋商制度内在功能剖析的基础上,本文运用实际案例,通过对磋商完成性、充分性与关联性三个方面的实证考察,深入发掘该制度中存在的问题,并结合多哈回合谈判提出了相关完善建议。通过全面分析,本文最后对WTO争端磋商制度在"磋商解决"与"司法裁决"中的平衡价值进行了阐释和论证。
As one kind of dispute settlement methods with both political and legal properties, the consultation under the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism(DSM) has many special characteristics. Based on the analysis of the institutional function of the consultation system, this paper employs law cases to conduct an empirical research on the consultation from the angles of completeness, adequacy and correlation of consultation, and provides suggestions of improvement for consultations in Doha Round negotiations. This paper finally examines the balanced values of the two key approaches stipulated in the WTO DSM, namely "consultation" and "adj udication"
出处
《中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
2013年第3期85-89,共5页
Journal of Ocean University of China(Social Sciences)
基金
西南政法大学国际法学院项目"中国参与世贸争端与促进涉外法律人才培养问题研究"
编号为GJFXSYJCX-16
西南政法大学国际法学院项目"涉外法律人才培养的教学方法改革研究--以国际经济法的教学改革为试点"
关键词
WTO
争端解决机制
磋商
管辖权
WTO
dispute settlement mechanism
consultation
jurisdiction