期刊文献+

空腹血糖受损切点下调对糖调节受损患病率影响的调查 被引量:1

Investigation on Impact of Lowering Cut-Point of Impaired Fasting Glucose in Impaired Glucose Regulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨下调空腹血糖受损切点后,本地区糖调节受损(IGR)患病情况分布的变化。方法选择2010年至2011年在我院进行健康体检者784例,按不同空腹血糖水平进行分组,分析患者IGR分布的变化情况。结果空腹血糖受损诊断标准下调后,空腹血糖受损患病例数增加85例,空腹血糖受损患病率由14%增至25%,两者比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=88.3,P<0.05);正常糖耐量由57.9%降至46.9%,两者比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=48.2,P<0.05)。空腹血糖5.6~6.0mmol/L组与<5.6mmol/L组及与6.1~6.9mmol/L组比较,在超重或肥胖、高血压、高血脂、脂肪肝及心电图异常方面比较,P<0.05。结论本地区IGR患者分布显著受空腹血糖受损切点下调影响,对于新增单纯空腹血糖受损人群应及早进行干预或治疗。 Objective To explore the change of prevalence distribution of impaired glucose regulation (IGR) after lowering the cut-point of impaired fasting glucose (IFG). Methods 784 healthy people with physical examination were divided according to the fasting plasma glucose to analyze the change of IGR distribution. Results After lowering the cut-point of IFG, the incidence of IFG increased from 14% to 25% (χ2 = 88.3, P 〈0.05); the normal glucose tolerance decreased from 57.9% to 46.9% (χ2 = 48.2, P〈0.05). Compared with FBG 5.6 - 6.0 mmol/L group, both FBG 〈5.6 rnmol/L group and 6.1 - 6.9 mmol/L group had significant differences in the overweight or obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, fatty liver, and electrocardiogram abnormality (all P〈0.05). Conclusions Lowering the cut-point of IFG has significant influence in the prevalence distribution of IGR. The new patients with IGR should be intervened or treated as soon as possible.
出处 《临床医学工程》 2013年第6期765-766,共2页 Clinical Medicine & Engineering
关键词 糖尿病 患病率 糖调节受损 Diabetes Prevalence rate impaired fasting glucose
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献57

  • 1贾伟平,潘洁敏,陈蕾,吴元民,陆俊茜,项坤三.空腹血糖受损切点变化与糖尿病及心脑血管事件风险的关系——上海华阳社区40岁以上人群的随访研究[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2004,20(5):392-395. 被引量:86
  • 2张波,王金平,杨文英,姜亚云,胡泽溪,萧建中,胡英华,李光伟.空腹血糖受损诊断标准下调的合理性分析[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2004,20(5):396-398. 被引量:37
  • 3王瑶,杨文英,杨兆军,李光伟.从心血管危险因素看空腹血糖受损切点下调[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2004,20(5):399-402. 被引量:25
  • 4刘力生.2004年中国高血压防治指南(实用本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(12):1060-1064. 被引量:2620
  • 5.中国城市统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2000..
  • 6李立明主编.流行病学:第四版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000,8.254-267.
  • 7Tai ES,Goh SY,Lee JJ,et al.Lowering the criterion for impaired fastin glucose:impact on disease prevalence and associated risk of diabetes and schemic heart disease[J].Diabetes Care,2004,27(7):1728-1734.
  • 8Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J, et al. Plasma glucose within the normal range is not associated with carotid atherosclerosis : prospective results in subjects with normal glucose tolerance from the Bruneck Study [ J ] . Diabetes Care, 1999, 22 ( 8 ) : 1339-1346.
  • 9Hanefeld M, Koehler C, Fuecker K, et al. Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity pattern is different in isolated impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose : the risk factor in Impaired Glucose Tolerance for Atherosclerosis and Diabetes study [ J ] . Diabetes Care, 2003, 26 (3) : 868-874.
  • 10The DECODE-Study Group, European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Is fasting glucose sufficient to define diabetes? Epidemiological data from 20 European studies. The DECODE-study group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology : Collaborative analysis of Diagnostic Criteria in Europe [ J ] . Diabetologia, 1999, 42 ( 6 ) : 647-654.

共引文献693

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部