摘要
目的探讨单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗慢性阑尾炎的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析北京中日友好医院2010年1月至2012年11月同一术者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗慢性阑尾炎共计121例,其中单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术58例,三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术63例,比较分析两组的临床资料。结果与三孔腹腔镜组比较,单孔腹腔镜组切口满意度得分较高,(4.5±0.7)比(3.0±0.6),t=13.50,P=0.00;术后对止痛药的需求次数较少,(1.2±0.5)次比(2.1±0.7)次,t=-8.25,P=0.00;手术时间未增加,(40±10)min比(37±9)min,t=1.94,P=0.055;失血量未增多,(12±6)ml比(13±6)ml,t=-1.50,P=0.137;术后住院时间无差异,(1.4±0.6)d比(1.6±0.7)d,t=-1.82,P=0.072。全组在围手术期均无手术并发症发生。结论单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术安全可行,与常规三孔腹腔镜手术有相似的临床效果。
Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) for chronic appendicitis. Methods Data of patients who had undergone either conventional threeport surgery ( n = 58) or SPLS ( n = 63 ) for chronic appendicitis between January 2010 and November 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The short-term outcomes of these 2 operative modalities were compared. Results The overall satisfaction score of SPLS group was significantly higher than that of the three-port group (4. 5 ±0. 7) vs. (3.0-±0. 6) ,t = 13.50,P =0. 00, there was less frequent use of parenteral narcotics in SPLS patients ( 1.2± 0. 5) vs. (2. 1 ± 0. 7) times, t = - 8.25,P = 0. 00, length of operation time was the same in SPLS group (40 ± 10) vs. (37 ±9) minutes, t = 1.94, P =0. 055. There was not different in postoperative recovery (1.4 ± 0.6) vs. (1.6 ± 0.7) d, t = - 1.82,P = 0.072, nor different in perioperative complications and intraoperative blood loss between groups ( 12 ± 6 ) vs. ( 13 ± 6 ) ml, t = - 1.50,P = 0. 137. Conclusions SPLS is both safe and feasible in the treatment of chronic appendicitis.
出处
《中华普通外科杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2013年第6期421-423,共3页
Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词
阑尾炎
腹腔镜
阑尾切除术
Appendicitis
Laparoscopes
Appendectomy