期刊文献+

经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗慢性阑尾炎58例 被引量:47

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for chronic appendicitis: a report of 58 cases MENG
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗慢性阑尾炎的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析北京中日友好医院2010年1月至2012年11月同一术者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗慢性阑尾炎共计121例,其中单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术58例,三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术63例,比较分析两组的临床资料。结果与三孔腹腔镜组比较,单孔腹腔镜组切口满意度得分较高,(4.5±0.7)比(3.0±0.6),t=13.50,P=0.00;术后对止痛药的需求次数较少,(1.2±0.5)次比(2.1±0.7)次,t=-8.25,P=0.00;手术时间未增加,(40±10)min比(37±9)min,t=1.94,P=0.055;失血量未增多,(12±6)ml比(13±6)ml,t=-1.50,P=0.137;术后住院时间无差异,(1.4±0.6)d比(1.6±0.7)d,t=-1.82,P=0.072。全组在围手术期均无手术并发症发生。结论单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术安全可行,与常规三孔腹腔镜手术有相似的临床效果。 Objective To evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) for chronic appendicitis. Methods Data of patients who had undergone either conventional threeport surgery ( n = 58) or SPLS ( n = 63 ) for chronic appendicitis between January 2010 and November 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The short-term outcomes of these 2 operative modalities were compared. Results The overall satisfaction score of SPLS group was significantly higher than that of the three-port group (4. 5 ±0. 7) vs. (3.0-±0. 6) ,t = 13.50,P =0. 00, there was less frequent use of parenteral narcotics in SPLS patients ( 1.2± 0. 5) vs. (2. 1 ± 0. 7) times, t = - 8.25,P = 0. 00, length of operation time was the same in SPLS group (40 ± 10) vs. (37 ±9) minutes, t = 1.94, P =0. 055. There was not different in postoperative recovery (1.4 ± 0.6) vs. (1.6 ± 0.7) d, t = - 1.82,P = 0.072, nor different in perioperative complications and intraoperative blood loss between groups ( 12 ± 6 ) vs. ( 13 ± 6 ) ml, t = - 1.50,P = 0. 137. Conclusions SPLS is both safe and feasible in the treatment of chronic appendicitis.
出处 《中华普通外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期421-423,共3页 Chinese Journal of General Surgery
关键词 阑尾炎 腹腔镜 阑尾切除术 Appendicitis Laparoscopes Appendectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Vidal 0, Valentini M, Ginest/ C, et al. Laparoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy. Surg Endosc,2010, 24: 686-691.
  • 2St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Juang D, et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg,2011,254:586-590.
  • 3范莹,吴硕东,孔静,苏洋,田雨.经脐单孔腹腔镜脾切除术与多孔手术的对比研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2012,27(11):910-912. 被引量:14
  • 4Greaves N, Nicholson J. Single incision laparoscopie surgery in general surgery: a review. Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 2011,93 : 437-440.

二级参考文献5

  • 1Barbaros U,Din(c)(c)a(g) A. Single incision laparoscopic splenectomy:the first two cases[J].Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery,2009.1520-1523.
  • 2Targarona EM,Balague C,Martinez C. Single-port access:a feasible alternative to conventional laparoscopic splenectomy[J].SURGICAL INNOVATION,2009.348-352.
  • 3Maurus CF,Sch(a)fer M,Müller MK. Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for nontraumatic diseases[J].World Journal of Surgery,2008.2444-2449.
  • 4Wu SD,Han JY,Tian Y. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a retrospective comparative study[J].Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Part A,2011.25-28.
  • 5Fan Y,Wu SD,Kong J. Single-Port Access Transaxillary Totally Endoscopic Thyroidectomy:A New Approach for Minimally Invasive Thyroid Operation[J].Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Part A,2011.243-247.

共引文献13

同被引文献254

引证文献47

二级引证文献235

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部