期刊文献+

基于VEGA和DCGA的化工园区布局优化研究 被引量:1

Study on layout optimization for chemical industry park based on VEGA and DCGA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 化工园区布局优化是一个复杂的多目标优化问题,建立了以事故风险和经济收益为两个优化指标的化工园区布局优化模型,以潜在死亡人数(PLL)表征事故风险,以销售收入表征经济收益;从算法的正确性、有效性及其搜索性能上提出了三条化工园区布局优化算法性能的评价准则;基于向量评价遗传算法(VEGA)和基于确定性拥挤机制的小生境遗传算法(DCGA)分别对化工园区布局优化进行研究,并对比分析了优化计算结果,得出:建立的化工园区双目标布局优化模型和提出的优化方法是可行的,计算所得的Pareto最优解对化工园区布局具有较好的参考价值;VEGA算法仅能满足部分准则要求,而DCGA算法能同时满足三条评价准则要求,可知DCGA算法适用于化工园区布局优化。 The layout optimization for chemical industry park is a complex multiobjective optimization problem. A layout optimization model for chemical industry park that accident risk and economic benefit were taken as two optimized targets was established, the potential accident loss of life (PLL) and sales revenue were respectively taken as characterization of accident risk and economic benefit. From the correctness, effectiveness and search performance of the algorithm, three performance evaluation criterias of optimization algorithm for the chemical industry park lay out were put forward. Research on layout optimization for the chemical industry park was made respectively accord ing to vector evaluated genetic algorithm (VEGA) and niche genetic algorithm based on the deterministic crowding mechanism (DCGA), and optimization calculation results were comparatively analyzed. The conclusions were as follows : the established twoobjective layout optimization model and proposed optimization methods for the chemical industry park were feasible, the calculated Pareto optimal solutions had a good reference value for the chemical in dustry park layout. VEGA could only meet some criteria requirements, but DCGA could simultaneously meet thethree evaluation criterias, which showed that DCGA is suitable for the chemical industry park layout optimization.
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS CSCD 2013年第5期45-51,共7页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
基金 中国安全生产科学研究院基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2012JBKY01)
关键词 化工园区 布局优化 VEGA DCGA chemical industry park layout optimization VEGA DCGA
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献55

共引文献80

同被引文献13

  • 1GB50160--2008,石油化工企业设计防火规范[S].
  • 2Chang J I,Lin C C. A study of storage tank accidents[J]. Jour- nal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006 (19) : 51- 59.
  • 3Khakzada N, Reniers G. Risk-based design of process plants with regard to domino effects and land use planning[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015,299 : 289-297.
  • 4GB50074--2014石油库设计规范[s].
  • 5Abdolhamidzadeh B, Abbasi T, Rashtchian D, et al. A new method for assessing domino effect in chemical process industry [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010,182 ( 1/2/3 ) : 416- 426.
  • 6Cozzani V,Gubinelli G,Salzano E. Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events[J]. Journal of Hazard- ous Materials, 2006, A129 : 1-21.
  • 7Bagster D F, Pitblado R M. The estimation of domino incident frequencies--An approach [J]. Process Safety Environmental Protection, 1991,69(4) : 195-199.
  • 8Cozzani V, Antonioni G, Spadom G. Quantitative assessment of domino scenarios by a GIS-based software tool[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19 (5): 463- 477.
  • 9叶君乐,蒋军成,张明广,孙东亮.基于本质安全目标的化工厂装置平面布局优化[J].安全与环境学报,2011,11(1):167-171. 被引量:5
  • 10陈国华,施文松,赵远飞.基于风险的化工园区布局优化决策支持系统[J].中国安全科学学报,2012,22(7):141-146. 被引量:7

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部