期刊文献+

生产过程危险有害因素辨识方法与流程 被引量:9

Recognition method and procedure of hazard causal factors in the course of production
下载PDF
导出
摘要 危险有害因素辨识、危险等级评定与安全对策措施的提出是安全评价的主要任务,是发现危险源头的重要手段。生产过程危险有害因素的辨识工作是一项系统工程,作为安全评价工作的重中之重,辨识的全面与否和深度直接影响评价结果的好坏和措施的针对性。根据危险有害因素存在的特点,从危险源分析入手,同时考虑工艺条件、操作环境、危险故障状态等因素,提出危险辨识的基本要素和流程,从而使辨识人员避免在危险辨识过程中由于操作不规范而发生遗漏的现象发生。 Hazard recognition, hazard risk assessment and providing preventive measures are the primary tasks in a safety risk assessment, which is the effective method of finding out the hazard sources in a production system. Thinking of a lot of complexities in a production system, we must regard hazard recognition as system engineering. Usually, it is difficult to find out all the hazard causal factors in a system. But it is the most important work in a safety risk assessment project. The scope and depth of the hazard recognition account for the consequence of the as- sessment work, and are relative to the quality of preventive measures. Based on the existing character of hazard causal factors, many factors were analyzed starting from hazard sources. These hazard causal factors listed were cate- gorized into four groups, including production process conditions, operational environment, and failure states. Then the basic items and flow diagram on hazard recognition after the system safety personnel avoid the omission phenomena due to the nonstandard operation in analysis. It can make the recognrition the hazard recognition process
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS CSCD 2013年第5期102-105,共4页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
关键词 危险有害因素 危险辨识 辨识流程 hazard causal factors hazard recognition recognition procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1GB/T13861-2009.生产过程危险和有害因素分类与代码[s].2009.
  • 2Joe Stephenson System safety2000 ; A Practical Guide for Planning, Managing, and Conducting System Safety Programs, New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1991,60-65.
  • 3B.E. Goldberg, K. Everhart, R. Stevens, N. Babbitt III, P. Clemens, and L. Stout System Engineering "Toolbox" for Design-Oriented Engineers [ M ] Alabama: NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, 1994, C1-D6.
  • 4刘铁民.事故灾难成因再认识——脆弱性研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(5):5-10. 被引量:69
  • 5陈宝智系统安全原理[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,2001.
  • 6田丰.汽轮机润滑油低油压保护探讨[J].电力安全技术,2004,6(10):16-17. 被引量:2
  • 7AQ/T9002--2006.生产经营单位安全生产事故应急预案编制导则[S].2006.
  • 8师立晨,刘骥,魏利军,吴宗之.重大危险源多米诺效应的后果分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2007,3(6):44-48. 被引量:28

二级参考文献37

  • 1刘铁民.重大事故动力学演化[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2006,2(6):3-6. 被引量:32
  • 2[2]Gledhill,I.Lines.Development of methods to assess the significance of domino effects from major hazard sites,CR Report 183.Health and Safety Executive.1998.
  • 3[3]V.Cozzani,G.Gubinelli,E.Salzano,Escalation thresholds in the assessment of domino accidental events,Journal of Hazardous Materials[J].2006,129:1~21
  • 4[4]Khan FI.Abbasi SA.Models for domino effect analysis in chemical process industries.Process Safety Progress[J].1998,17(2):107~113
  • 5[5]V.Cozzani etal.The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis.Journal of Hazardous Materials[J].2005,127:14~30
  • 6[6]Casal,J.etal.ARAMIS-Severity evaluation.Research report.2004
  • 7[7]CCPS,Guidelines for evaluating the characteristics of VCEs,Flash Fires and BLEVEs,AlChE,New York,1994
  • 8[8]CCPS,Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis,AIChE,New York,2000.
  • 9[9]SamMannan,Lee's Loss Preventioninthe Process Industries[M].third edition,Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann,MA,USA,2005
  • 10The Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina:Lessons learned. The White House,2006.

共引文献102

同被引文献58

引证文献9

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部