期刊文献+

理想读者视角下的批评话语分析 被引量:1

Critical Interpretation Analysis from the Perspective of Idealized Reader Framework
下载PDF
导出
摘要 长期以来,批评话语分析疏于对读者认知的系统研究,只注重文本分析和社会文化解释,而对解读阶段的研究只"提"不"问"。O’Halloran(2003)的"理想读者框架"为研究读者认知提供了参照点,但该框架只强调读者的个体认知和阅读目的,限制了读者的类型,割裂了读者的个体认知与社会认知,忽视了对阅读前读者知识结构的研究,简单地将认知付出等同于话语理解的深度。将个体认知与社会认知结合起来,区分不同类型的读者,研究具有意识形态性质的知识结构,有助于更好地把握意识形态如何通过文本在大众中传播和变化。 Since its emergence in the 1970s, critical discourse analysis lays its emphasis more on the text analysis and the socio-cultural analysis than on the interpretation analysis. O'Halloran's idealized reader framework tries to address such a tendency. However, this framework overemphasizes the role of the reader's personal cognition and specific reading goal, segregates personal cognition and social cognition and overlooks the research on the knowledge types in the reader's mind, especially those with ideological flavors. Moreover, in such a framework, the depth of understanding is simply determined by the cognitive efforts. It is necessary to combine personal cognition and social cognition in the research of pre-reading knowledge structure such that themechanism of ideology can be better grasped.
作者 黄忠伟
机构地区 宁波工程学院
出处 《宁波工程学院学报》 2013年第2期10-14,共5页 Journal of Ningbo University of Technology
关键词 理想读者框架 读者认知 读者类型 意识形态 idealized reader framework, reader's cognition, type of readers, ideology
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Blommaert, Fairclough, Fairclough, Fairclough, Fowler, R., Gee, J. P. J. Discourse: A Critical Introduction [M]. UK: Cambridge University Press,2005.
  • 2N. Language and Power [M]. London:Longman,1989.
  • 3N. Discourse and Social Change [M]. UK: Polity Press,1992.
  • 4N. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research [M]. london: Routledge,2003.
  • 5et al. Language and Control [M]. London: Routledge&Kegan Paul,1979.
  • 6Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. (3rd ed)[M]. London and New York:Routledge2008.
  • 7Halliday,M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2000.
  • 8Halliday, M.A.K & Matthiessen, C. Construing Experience through Meaning [M].北京:世界图书出版公司,2008.
  • 9O'Halloran,K. Critical Discourse Analysis and Language Cognition [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003.
  • 10van Dijk, T.A. Discourse and Context: a socio-cognitive approach [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

二级参考文献24

  • 1李丽生.应用语言学研究的新视野——《批评应用语言学:批评性概论》评介[J].现代外语,2005,28(1):87-90. 被引量:16
  • 2戴炜华,高军.批评语篇分析:理论评述和实例分析[J].外国语,2002,25(6):42-48. 被引量:184
  • 3Slembrouck, S. Explanation, Interpretation and Critique in the Analysis of Discourse [ J ]. Critique of Anthropology, 2001 (21).
  • 4Slobin, D. Universal and Particular in the Acquisition of Language [ A ]. In E. Wanner and L. R. Gleitman (eds.). Language Acquisition: The State of the Art [C]. Cambridge: CUP, 1982.
  • 5Stubbs, M. W. Whorf' s Children: Critical Comments on Critical Discourse Analysis [ A ]. In A. Ryan & A. Wray ( eds. ). Evolving Models of Language: British Studies in Applied Linguistics 12[ C]. Clevedon: BAAL/ Muhilingual Matters, 1998.
  • 6Titscher, S. et al. Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis [ M ]. London: Sage, 2000.
  • 7van Dijk, T. Discourse, Power and Access [A]. In C. R. Caldas-Couhhard & R. Coulthard ( eds. ). Texts and Practices : Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis [ C ]. London: Routledge, 1996.
  • 8Verschueren, J. Predicaments of Criticism [J ]. Critique of Anthropology, 2001 (21).
  • 9Widdowson, H. G. Discourse Analysis: A Critical View [ J ]. Language and Literature, 1995 a (3).
  • 10Widdowson, H. G. Norman Fairclough: Discourse and Social Change [J]. Applied Linguistics, 1995b(4).

共引文献60

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部